
bet365

BetMGM

Betfred

BetVictor

BetUK

LiveScoreBet

10Bet

Virgin Bet

EasyBet
Cesena vs Sampdoria: Finishing Problems Put Efficiency Under the Spotlight. Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
Both teams have struggled to convert chances into goals recently, with Cesena averaging 0.9 goals from 11.4 attempts and Sampdoria scoring 0.6 despite 51.4% possession. Their recent matches often see one side failing to score, making Both Teams To Score NO a logical choice.
The 0-0 scoreline fits both teams' low scoring averages and recent shutout matches, with historical precedent from their last meeting. Sampdoria's defense and Cesena's modest scoring support a goalless draw despite Cristian Shpendi's threat.
Compare form, H2H, goals trends and key data for Cesena v Sampdoria.
Cesena and Sampdoria begin their Serie B campaigns at Orogel Stadium-Dino Manuzzi with recent evidence pointing to a match shaped less by possession than by what either side can actually do with it.
Cesena vs Sampdoria — bet365 Market Snapshot
Swipe through key markets with illustrative probabilities and sample bet365 odds based on our match analysis.
Cesena and Sampdoria bring contrasting strengths, leaving this market finely balanced.
Cesena and Sampdoria have similar recent form, suggesting a balanced contest.
Both teams have low scoring averages, indicating a likely low-scoring match.
The recent team data offers the safer performance angle here, without relying on an unverified individual-player claim.
Three Punchy Stats
- Cesena have averaged 11.4 attempts but only 0.9 goals across their last 10 league games, a gap that underlines their need to convert pressure more efficiently.
- Sampdoria have scored just 0.6 goals per league match across their last 10 despite averaging 51.4% possession, so having the ball has not guaranteed meaningful attacking reward.
- Five of each side’s last six matches have featured at least one team failing to score, reinforcing the possibility that clear attacking moments may be at a premium.
Goals per Game Comparison
Recent attacking records for Cesena and Sampdoria are shown below.
Goals Conceded Comparison
Recent defensive records for Cesena and Sampdoria are shown below.
Both arrive after Coppa Italia defeats, Cesena losing 3-0 at Sassuolo and Sampdoria going down 2-0 at Cremonese. More revealing, though, is their longer league record. Cesena have won only once in their last 10 league matches, while Sampdoria have four victories in the same span. Yet neither attack has been especially productive, leaving efficiency at both ends as the more useful measure.
Cesena Are Creating More Than Their Results Suggest
Cesena’s recent league return of 0.9 goals per game looks modest beside an average of 11.4 attempts. They have also put 3.8 shots on target per match, which means the problem is not simply an inability to reach shooting positions.
Their previous Serie B match illustrates the other side of the equation. Cesena had 58% possession and registered 10 shots on target against Calcio Padova, with Cristian Shpendi scoring twice and Alberto Cerri once, yet still lost 4-3.
That is an unusually stark example of attacking output being undermined elsewhere. Across the last 10 league games, Cesena have conceded 1.5 goals per match from 12.5 attempts and 3.8 shots on target. Their opponents have therefore matched Cesena’s average number of efforts on target but extracted considerably more goals from them.
Shpendi’s three goals across that league sequence make him Cesena’s leading scorer, while Cerri and Tommaso Corazza have two each. There is at least a little more spread to their attacking contribution than Sampdoria have managed.
Sampdoria’s Possession Needs More End Product
Sampdoria’s difficulty is different. They average 51.4% possession across their last 10 league matches and had 68% of the ball in the 1-0 defeat at Reggiana, yet their scoring average over that broader sequence is only 0.6 goals per game.
They have produced 9.9 attempts and 3.4 shots on target per match, so their attacking volume trails Cesena’s slightly without a compensating rise in efficiency. Six players share the team’s leading individual league total with only one goal apiece.
There is a defensive counterweight. Sampdoria have conceded 1.1 goals per match from 9.7 attempts and 3.2 shots on target, better figures than Cesena’s corresponding record. That could matter against hosts whose recent attacking work has generated pressure without consistently translating it into results.
Recent Patterns Point Towards a Tight Contest
Low-scoring patterns run through both teams’ recent matches. Five of Cesena’s previous six games have ended with at least one side failing to score, and the same is true of five of Sampdoria’s last six.
Their most recent league meeting fits neatly into that picture. Cesena and Sampdoria drew 0-0 in April, when Cesena had 10 attempts but only two on target, while Sampdoria managed three on target from 13.
Cesena are unbeaten in the last three meetings between the sides. Across the previous six head-to-head fixtures, however, there have been two Cesena wins, one Sampdoria victory and three draws, suggesting little sustained separation.
📊 Market Explainer
Both Teams to Score (BTTS)
Selection: Both Teams To Score NO. Both teams must score at least once during normal time. The match winner does not matter; the selection is settled only by whether each side finds the net.
Correct Score Market
Selection: Cesena vs Sampdoria 0-0. Predict the exact score at the end of 90 minutes plus stoppage time. Extra time and penalties do not count unless the bookmaker states otherwise.
🎯 Pick 1: Both Teams To Score NO @ 23/20
Cesena and Sampdoria enter this Serie B fixture with recent outings defined by limited goal conversion. Cesena have won once in their last 10 league matches, averaging 0.9 goals per game from 11.4 attempts. Sampdoria recorded four victories over that span, but their scoring output stands at 0.6 goals per match despite 51.4% possession. Neither side scored in their Coppa Italia matches, as Cesena lost 3-0 to Sassuolo and Sampdoria fell 2-0 to Cremonese. These figures show that both teams struggle to turn build-up play into goals.
Match statistics reinforce this lack of finishing sharpness. Five of Cesena’s last six matches featured at least one side failing to score, a pattern matched by Sampdoria across five of their previous six games. In their April meeting, the teams drew 0-0 as Cesena managed two shots on target from 10 efforts and Sampdoria produced three on target from 13. Although Cesena logged 10 shots on target in a 4-3 defeat to Calcio Padova, Sampdoria’s defence has conceded 1.1 goals per match from 9.7 attempts across 10 league fixtures.
Cesena’s defensive return offers the primary risk, having conceded 1.5 goals per match across 10 league games. Cristian Shpendi has also scored three goals in that sequence for Cesena. However, Sampdoria held 68% possession against Reggiana yet lost 1-0 without scoring, while six Sampdoria players share their team lead with just one goal each. This lack of prolific finishing makes Both Teams To Score NO a well-supported option.
🎯 Tactical Indicators
- Five of Cesena's last six matches ended with at least one side failing to score.
- Five of Sampdoria's last six matches ended with at least one side failing to score.
- The previous Serie B meeting between Cesena and Sampdoria in April finished 0-0.
Risk Factor: Cesena conceded 1.5 goals per match across their last 10 league games, so a defensive lapse could allow both teams to score.
Key Tactical Mismatch
Cesena and Sampdoria enter this Serie B fixture with recent outings defined by limited goal conversion.
Match statistics reinforce this lack of finishing sharpness.
📊 Pick 2: Cesena vs Sampdoria 0-0 @ 9/1
Selecting a 0-0 scoreline requires establishing why neither attack is likely to break through over 90 minutes. Cesena’s scoring numbers support their side of the scoreless equation, having averaged 0.9 goals per match across their last 10 league fixtures. They were also kept off the scoresheet in their Coppa Italia defeat to Sassuolo. Meanwhile, Sampdoria’s defensive record provides backing against Cesena scoring, with the visitors conceding 1.1 goals per game while allowing 3.2 shots on target per match across 10 league outings.
Sampdoria’s goal metrics provide equal justification for why they can be restricted to zero. The visitors averaged 0.6 goals per match across their last 10 league fixtures, failing to score in their Coppa Italia loss to Cremonese and in a 1-0 defeat to Reggiana where they held 68% possession. Their lack of a central goal threat is shown by six players sharing the team lead with one league goal each. Facing an attack averaging 3.4 shots on target per game helps offset Cesena’s 1.5 goals conceded average.
Historical precedent directly supports this outcome, as these clubs played out a 0-0 draw in their previous Serie B meeting in April, generating just five total shots on target. The main risk to a 0-0 outcome stems from Cristian Shpendi, who scored three goals in Cesena’s last 10 league games, including two against Calcio Padova. Nevertheless, given the low goal averages across both teams, 0-0 represents a coherent exact scoreline.
Risk Factor: Cristian Shpendi's three goals in Cesena's last 10 league matches pose a risk to a scoreless outcome.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Both Teams To Score NO mean for this match?
It wins if at least one team fails to score in 90 minutes plus stoppage time.
How does the 0-0 Correct Score market settle?
It wins only if neither team scores during normal time plus stoppage time.
Why do recent scoring trends support Both Teams To Score NO?
Five of each side's last six matches ended with at least one team failing to score.
What was the outcome of the last Serie B meeting between these teams?
Cesena and Sampdoria played out a 0-0 draw with few shots on target.
How do Coppa Italia results factor into this prediction?
Both sides lost without scoring, highlighting ongoing difficulties in finding the net.
What is the main risk when backing a 0-0 scoreline?
A single goal from either team would defeat the 0-0 correct score bet.


