bet365
BetMGM
William Hill
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
Mali and Zambia start their Africa Cup of Nations journey with a Group A meeting at Stade Mohammed V in Casablanca on Monday, a venue that rarely does “quiet” once the game gets a foothold. It’s a curtain-raiser with two very different bits of momentum hanging in the air: Mali arriving with a recent run that reads like a team who knows how to manage matches, and Zambia turning up looking to reconnect with the level that once carried them to the top of the continent. Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
To use the Live Streaming service you will need to be logged in and have a funded account or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. Geo location and live streaming rules apply.
Works worldwide • Email + on-site access • Instant unlock
▾
Mali enters this contest with superior form, having won six of their last ten matches while maintaining a clean-sheet rate of 70%. Their defensive stability, conceding only 0.3 goals per game, contrasts sharply with a Zambian side that has lost eight of its last ten games and struggles with a low 6% conversion rate. Historically, Mali has never lost a tournament opener in 13 attempts, further solidifying their position as the more reliable selection to secure all three points in Casablanca.
▾
This scoreline reflects Mali’s offensive efficiency and defensive dominance. Mali averages 1.47 xG per match and faces a Zambian defense that concedes 1.7 goals per game on average. Given Mali's ability to keep clean sheets in seven out of ten recent matches and Zambia's persistent struggles to find the net—evidenced by their 0.8 goals per match average—a multi-goal victory for the West Africans without conceding is the most logical outcome based on the available performance metrics.
Readers’ Tip
Vote your pick — quick & anonymous
Terms & Conditions (tap to view)
Mali vs Zambia Predictions and Best Bets
Mali vs Zambia — bet365 Market Snapshot
Swipe through key markets with illustrative probabilities and sample bet365 odds based on our match analysis.
Pricing suggests Mali’s consistent recent form and defensive stability give them a significant advantage over a struggling Zambia side.
Mali’s high clean-sheet rate (70%) makes narrow win scorelines without conceding the primary pricing focus.
The market expects a tactical opener, with implied probabilities favouring a lower-scoring affair given the tournament stage.
- Mali’s WC Qualification Africa 2025 record shows 19 goals scored and only 3 conceded in 10 matches, alongside a 70% clean-sheet rate that underlines their defensive control.
- Zambia’s recent run reads 2 wins and 8 losses in their last 10 fixtures, with 17 goals conceded in that spell, hinting at how often they’ve been forced into damage limitation.
- Mali average 10.89 shots per match with a 17% conversion rate, while Zambia average 8.75 shots per match with a 6% conversion rate — a gap that can decide tight tournament games.
Defensive Reliability: Goals Conceded per Match
A comparison of how often each side’s defence has been breached during their respective 2025 qualification and friendly campaigns.
Mali has established a formidable defensive line, recording clean sheets in 70% of their recent competitive fixtures.
Zambia’s recent 2025 outings have seen them struggle to shut out opponents, allowing nearly two goals per game on average.
Attacking Efficiency: Conversion Rate
This illustrates how clinical each team is in front of goal based on the percentage of shots that result in a goal.
With nearly 5 shots on target per game, Mali’s conversion rate reflects a high level of efficiency when entering the final third.
Despite finding attacking positions, Zambia has found it difficult to finish sequences, averaging under one goal per match.
Can Mali’s defensive control smother Zambia’s search for a fresh tournament spark?
Zambia’s history in this tournament is spelled out in one sharp line: an Africa Cup of Nations title from 2012, still the solitary one. Mali, meanwhile, are framed here as a side “hoping to make a mark this year” — and the information that follows suggests they’ve been building habits that travel well: defensive control, a steady scoring rhythm, and a squad with multiple contributors rather than a single-point dependency.
The early feel of this one is tension and territory. Mali’s recent profile points towards a team happy to win without needing chaos; Zambia’s numbers hint at a side who can’t really afford to drift through long phases without the ball. With a group-stage opener, the psychological pull is obvious: don’t blink first, don’t give up the kind of soft goal that turns a neat plan into a frantic chase.
And if it does become frantic? The available stats suggest Mali may prefer that less than Zambia would. But the first match of a tournament has a habit of slipping its leash.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Mali’s possible starting XI is listed as: Samassa; Dante, Fofana, Niakate, W. Coulibaly; Dieng, Sangare; L. Doumbia, Nene Coulibaly; Toure. The spine is easy to read: Samassa behind a back line featuring Fofana and Niakate, with Dieng and Sangare central. Ahead of that, L. Doumbia and Nene Coulibaly suggest connectors between midfield and the final third, while Toure gives them a clear reference point up top.
That cluster of names in the middle hints at a side built to be competitive in duels and calm in the circulation. If Dieng and Sangare are paired, Mali can protect the centre and still have enough passing range to find the next line. With Dante and W. Coulibaly listed either side of the defence, there’s scope for width without having to throw caution at the structure.
Zambia’s possible starting XI is set out as: Mulenga; Bandar, Musonda, Chanda, Hamansenya; Phindi, Simunkonda, Chaiwa, Sakala; Kangwa, Daka. The shape reads like a back four with a midfield unit that can shuffle and press, and a front pairing where Kangwa can connect play and Daka can threaten the space behind.
The interesting part is the balance of Zambia’s midfield four. If Phindi, Simunkonda, Chaiwa and Sakala sit in a flat line at times, it can help them compress the pitch and keep Mali from playing straight through them. But it also risks leaving Kangwa and Daka isolated if Zambia can’t keep attacks alive long enough to bring runners forward.
Personnel-wise, Mali’s list of top scorers and assists suggests variety: Nene Dorgeles leads their scorers with 3, while Yves Bissouma, El Bilal Touré and Kamory Doumbia have 2 each. Zambia’s scoring list, by contrast, has Kennedy Musonda out in front with 4, with Kings Kangwa on 1 among others. That doesn’t decide a match on its own, but it shapes how each team might feel about where their goals are most likely to come from.
How the Match Could Be Played
If this becomes a battle for central control, Mali look equipped for it. Their overall possession average sits at 49%, which doesn’t scream domination, but it does suggest comfort without the need to hoard the ball. Zambia’s is 47%, close enough to imply this won’t automatically tilt one way — yet the match may still hinge on what each side does with the ball rather than how long they keep it.
Mali’s likely best route is to make the pitch feel narrow for Zambia in the early phases, then widen it suddenly. With a double pivot of Dieng and Sangare, Mali can draw pressure and play around it, particularly if L. Doumbia and Nene Coulibaly can find pockets between Zambia’s midfield and defence. If Zambia choose to press higher, that creates the classic dilemma: step up and risk leaving channels for Toure, or sit off and allow Mali’s midfielders time to pick passes.
For Zambia, the most obvious pressing cue is when Mali’s build-up slows. Mali’s numbers suggest they don’t concede often, and a team that concedes rarely is usually a team that doesn’t gift transitions cheaply. So Zambia may need to be selective: press in waves rather than a constant sprint, and make sure the first duel is backed up by the second. Phindi and Simunkonda could be key here as the players who close the central gate and force Mali towards the touchline.
In possession, Zambia’s challenge is sustaining attacks. With Daka and Kangwa listed as the front pair, there’s a natural division of labour available: Kangwa as the link and Daka as the runner. If Zambia can feed Kangwa early and get Sakala or Chaiwa moving beyond him, they can try to drag Mali’s midfield line backwards and create space for a shot or a slipped pass. But if Zambia’s wide and central support arrives late, it turns into hopeful balls into traffic — the kind Mali’s defensive record implies they enjoy dealing with.
Transitions could decide the rhythm. Mali’s scoring rate and chance creation point to a side capable of turning a steady spell into a decisive moment without needing ten previous warnings. Zambia, with a lower conversion profile, may need either volume or clean, high-value chances — and against a team that concedes so little, those don’t come for free.
The quiet subplot is game state. If Mali score first, their numbers suggest they can turn the match into something controlled and stubborn. If Zambia score first, the game flips: Mali have to open more doors, and Zambia can try to play into the spaces that appear.
William Hill
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
BetMGM
Bet £10 Get £40 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
bet365
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Betfred
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
10bet
100% Up To £50 On First Deposit
Show Terms & Conditions
The Numbers That Support the Story
Mali’s recent outcomes paint a picture of competence and control: 6 wins, 2 draws and 2 losses in their last 10 fixtures. In the WC Qualification Africa 2025 sample provided, they’ve scored 19 and conceded 3 across 10 matches, a goal difference of +16 and 2.00 points per game. That concession figure matters because it supports a tactical expectation: Mali can commit numbers forward without feeling they must always keep a deep emergency line behind the ball.
The defensive detail is even sharper. Mali’s 0.3 conceded per match and 70% clean sheets suggest an ability to avoid the sort of small, silly moments that wreck tournament openers. It also implies that Zambia may need to be patient and precise, because getting one clear look might be the realistic target rather than a steady stream of chances.
On the attacking side, Mali average 10.89 shots per match with 4.67 on target, and an xG for of 1.47 per match. That combination suggests a side that creates enough and hits the target often enough to keep opponents under stress. Their overall conversion rate is listed at 17%, which reinforces the idea that when they do create, they can finish sequences with end product.
Zambia’s supplied season numbers come from International Friendlies 2025 and make for tougher reading: 2 wins, 0 draws and 8 losses in the last 10 fixtures, with 8 goals scored and 17 conceded. Their average of 0.8 scored per match matters because it points to the core issue in a game like this: you can defend for long spells, but you still need to turn one or two moments into a goal. Zambia’s xG for is 1.18 per match — not miles away from Mali’s — but their conversion rate is listed at 6%, a gap that can turn a reasonable performance into a frustrating one if the finishing doesn’t arrive.
Zambia also concede 1.7 per match with xG against of 1.75, which suggests opponents have been able to create meaningful chances. Against a Mali side producing close to eleven shots a game, that is a flashing warning light: if Zambia can’t slow Mali’s entries into the final third, the defensive line may be asked to do too much, too often.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first big moment is the midfield temperature. If Dieng and Sangare can receive, turn and play forward without being hit immediately, Mali can set the match’s pace and keep Zambia defending in sequences rather than single duels. If Zambia’s central unit — Phindi, Simunkonda, Chaiwa and Sakala — can crowd those first touches and force sideways play, they give themselves a foothold and keep Kangwa and Daka closer to the action.
The second is the quality of the first goal attempt that actually lands. Mali’s numbers point towards a side that can build pressure through shot volume and accuracy, while Zambia’s suggest they may not get many clean chances. That makes early efficiency disproportionately important: if Zambia’s first good look comes and goes, the game can start to feel like a long march. If it goes in, the entire tactical picture redraws itself.
The third is how Zambia handle Mali’s variety of scorers. With Nene Dorgeles on 3 and multiple Mali players on 2, the danger isn’t confined to one channel or one finisher. Zambia’s back line — Bandar, Musonda, Chanda and Hamansenya — will need to stay connected, because Mali’s threat can come from a runner between lines just as easily as a direct ball to Toure.
And then there’s the late-game tilt. Zambia’s profile includes a higher share of goals in the second half, with their second-half total goals average at 1.8 compared to 0.7 in the first half. That hints at matches that open up later — sometimes because the game loosens, sometimes because one side is chasing. Mali, by contrast, show strong clean-sheet habits across halves, which suggests they’ll welcome a slower finish if they’re ahead.
What could go wrong with this read? Tournament openers can ignore form and logic. One early mistake, one deflection, one set of nerves in front of goal — and the match becomes about emotion, not structure. If Mali’s attacking efficiency slips into wastefulness, Zambia can hang around long enough for a single moment to swing everything.
Best Bet for Mali vs Zambia
Works worldwide • Email + on-site access • Instant unlock
Mali to Win
The logic for a Mali victory is rooted in a stark contrast in competitive consistency and defensive reliability. Throughout the qualifying cycles leading into late 2025, Mali established themselves as a formidable unit that prioritizes control, losing only twice in their last ten outings while recording six victories. This stability is underpinned by a defensive record that seen them concede just 0.3 goals per match on average, supported by an impressive 70% clean-sheet rate. Such efficiency at the back provides a safety net that allows their diverse attacking group—featuring multiple goal threats like Nene Dorgeles and El Bilal Touré—to operate without the pressure of having to outscore a leaky defense.
Conversely, Zambia enters the tournament opener struggling for rhythm, having suffered eight losses in their most recent ten fixtures. Their defensive statistics are particularly concerning when compared to Mali’s; they concede an average of 1.7 goals per game and have a conversion rate in front of goal of just 6%. While Zambia possesses individual talent capable of moments of brilliance, their collective inability to keep clean sheets or find the net regularly makes the prospect of overcoming a disciplined Malian side difficult. Mali’s ability to maintain 49% possession and generate nearly 11 shots per match suggests they will dictate the tempo at Stade Mohammed V. Given that Mali has historically never lost their opening game in 13 previous tournament appearances, the statistical and tactical evidence heavily favors them to secure three points against an out-of-form opponent.
What could go wrong Tournament openers are notorious for being cagey affairs where the weight of expectation can lead to uncharacteristic errors. If Zambia can maintain their discipline in a low block and exploit a single transition through the pace of players like Patson Daka, they could frustrate Mali. Additionally, Mali’s tendency to play for control rather than chaos means a single clinical moment from Zambia could overturn the statistical advantage if Mali fails to convert their own volume of chances.
Correct Score Lean
Mali 2-0 Zambia
Rationale The selection of a 2-0 victory for Mali aligns with the significant defensive gap between the two sides. Mali’s recent form includes a high frequency of clean sheets, having prevented opponents from scoring in 70% of their recent matches. Offensively, they average nearly 1.5 expected goals (xG) per game and possess a 17% conversion rate, which suggests they are likely to find the net multiple times against a defense conceding 1.7 goals per outing. Zambia’s low conversion rate of 6% further supports the likelihood of Mali keeping a clean sheet in this specific matchup.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
| |
New cust. Deposit £10+ in 7 days & bet on sports. Min odds apply. Reward = 4 x £10 Free Bets (2 x £10 Bet Builders & 2 x £10 Sports bet). Valid 7 days. Free bets not valid on e-sports & non UK/IE horse racing. 18+. T&Cs apply. | |
| |
Open Account Offer - New Customers only. Bet £10 and get £30 in Free Bets when you join bet365. Sign up, deposit between £5 and £10 to your account and bet365 will give you three times that value in Free Bets when you place qualifying bets to the same value settle. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits. Min odds/bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. T&Cs , time limits & exclusions apply. Registration Required. #Ad. 18+ Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+. Play Safe. From 00:01 on 18.10.2022. £30 bonus. New customers only. Minimum £10 stake on odds of 1/2 (1.5) or greater on sportsbook (excluding Virtual markets). Further terms apply. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New customers only. Register, deposit with Debit Card, and place first bet £10+ at Evens (2.0)+ on Sports within 7 days to get 3 x £10 in Sports Free Bets & 2 x £10 in Acca Free Bets within 10 hours of settlement. 7-day expiry. Eligibility exclusions & T&Cs Apply. | |
| |
New cust only. Opt-in required. Deposit & place a bet within 7 days and settle a £10 minimum bet at odds of 4/5 (1.8) or greater to be credited with 3 x £10 Free Bets: 1 x £10 horse racing, 1 x £10 Free Bet Builder and 1 x £10 football. Free Bets cannot be used on e-sports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 7 day expiry. Stake not returned. 18+. T&Cs apply. Acca Club: Available to new & existing customers. 3 or more selections. Min Odds: 3/10 (1.3) per leg. Max stake: £500. Max Winnings: £200,000 per boost. Profit Boost amounts vary. Horse Racing, Greyhounds & Trotting excluded. Exclusions apply. Full T&C’s apply. 18+ GambleAware.org. | |
 | |
New members only. £10+ bet on sports (ex. Virtuals) 1.5 min odds, settled within 14 days. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days; £20 use on sportsbook, £10 on Bet Builder. Stake not returned. T&Cs.+ deposit exclusions apply #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New bettors. Select bonus at signup or use code SPORT. Wager deposit & bonus 8x. Max qualifying bet = bonus. Valid 60 days. Odds, bet & payment limits apply. T&Cs Apply; 18+ | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
New customers only, 18+. Min deposit £10. Place a £50 bet on any sport at 2.0+ to qualify for £25 in free bets and 10 Free Spins. Free Bets and Spins valid 7 days. £0.10 Free Spins. T&Cs apply. Please bet responsibly. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New members only. £10 min deposit & bet on sportsbook (ex. virtuals), placed & settled at 1.5 min odds in 14 days of sign-up. Win part of E/W bets. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days, use on sportsbook only (ex. virtuals), stakes not returned. T&Cs Apply and deposit exclusions apply. Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+ New customers only. Opt in, and bet £10 on football markets (odds 2.00+). No cash out. Get 6x£5 football free bets at specified odds for set markets, which expire after 7 days. Offer valid from 12:00 UK Time on 25/08/2023. Card payments only. T&Cs Apply | gambleaware.org | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
