bet365
BetMGM
William Hill
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
Can Aston Villa’s Villa Park rhythm return fast enough to blunt Nottingham Forest’s width? Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
▾
Doncaster rely heavily on crossing and attacking through the middle, a strategy that targets Southampton's specific weaknesses in aerial duels and set-piece defending. Conversely, Southampton dominate possession and are highly effective at using through balls to create high-quality chances, which happens to be a primary defensive flaw for Doncaster. Both sides have conceded a high volume of goals throughout their seasons, and Southampton’s tendency for individual errors often gifts opportunities to the opposition. This combination of attacking strengths and defensive frailties on both sides makes a goal for each team a likely occurrence.
▾
Southampton possess the higher individual quality and shot volume, which should allow them to outscore their lower-league hosts over ninety minutes. However, their well-documented struggles with defending crosses and aerial situations mean they are unlikely to keep a clean sheet against a Doncaster side that prioritizes wide play. A 2-1 result aligns with the statistical reality that both teams concede frequently—averaging well over a goal per game—while ensuring the Championship side’s technical dominance in the middle of the park eventually tips the final score in their favor.
Readers’ Tip
Vote your pick — quick & anonymous
Terms & Conditions (tap to view)
Aston Villa vs Nottingham Forest Predictions and Best Bets
Aston Villa vs Nottingham Forest — bet365 Market Snapshot
Market snapshot showing implied probabilities based on listed bet365 odds.
Villa enter as clear favorites at Villa Park, looking to extend their winning home streak against the visitors.
Single-goal margins for Villa or a high-scoring draw are the primary areas of interest in the correct score market.
With Villa’s streak of conceding in every game, Both Teams to Score (BTTS) is priced shorter than the ‘No’ option.
- Villa Park momentum: Aston Villa have won their last 10 home matches in all competitions, setting up a familiar home pattern of control, pressure, and repeated attacking phases.
- Finishing contrast: Nottingham Forest average 12.5 Premier League shots per game but have only 18 league goals in 19 matches, a mix that highlights shot volume without consistent conversion.
- Open games lately: both teams have scored in each of Aston Villa’s last seven matches in all competitions, hinting at a match rhythm where chances arrive at both ends.
Match Intensity: Shots per League Game
Both teams maintain high attacking volume, with Forest surprisingly slightly outshooting Villa on average across the campaign.
Villa have accumulated 305 total shots, focusing on high-quality chances created through middle channels and individual skill.
Forest have taken 336 total shots, often utilizing width and long-range attempts to test opposition defenses.
Technical Control: Passing Accuracy
Ball retention is a strength for both sides, suggesting a contest where technical quality in midfield will be pivotal.
A high accuracy rate supports Villa’s preference for short passing and patient build-up play.
Forest show similar technical reliability, allowing them to spend significant spells in the opposition half.
Aston Villa are back at Villa Park with a point to prove, and the timing is awkward in the best possible way: Nottingham Forest arrive while Villa are still shaking off the shock of seeing an 11-game winning run brought to an abrupt end. The midweek trip to Arsenal was a bruising one, ending 4-1, and it has punctured the mood just enough to make this feel like a reset moment rather than a wobble.
Forest, meanwhile, come into the weekend nursing their own frustrations after closing out 2025 with a home defeat to Everton. The table positions underline the contrast: Villa sit 3rd with 39 points from 19 games, while Forest are 17th on 18 points from the same number of matches. It’s not a fixture that needs extra spice, but the recent results give it that anyway.
There’s also a stylistic angle that makes this one intriguing. Both sides are flagged as strong when attacking down the wings, yet they share a handful of uncomfortable defensive themes: aerial duels and defending set pieces are listed as weaknesses for both. In other words, this could be the kind of match where the ball spends long spells in wide areas, but the biggest punch lands from a dead ball or a scrappy second phase.
Villa Park has been a happy place for the hosts lately too, and Forest’s recent run points to a team that’s had to dig in more than it would like. Put all that together and you’ve got a contest that should tell us plenty about how Villa respond to a proper slap, and whether Forest can turn their width and volume into something sharper.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Villa’s possible XI points towards a familiar shape and a clear idea: Emiliano Martínez in goal; Matty Cash, Ezri Konsa, Victor Lindelöf and Ian Maatsen across the back; Boubacar Kamara and Youri Tielemans as the central base; then John McGinn, Morgan Rogers and Donyell Malen supporting Ollie Watkins.
That selection leans into Villa’s stated preferences: short passing, frequent through balls, and a tendency to attack through the middle. With Kamara and Tielemans together, the balance suggests a platform that can circulate possession (Villa are listed at 54% ball possession with 86% passing accuracy) and still spring runners between the lines. The trio behind Watkins is the eye-catcher: Rogers has seven Premier League goals and three assists, Malen has four goals and one assist in limited minutes, and McGinn brings the combative edge and running to knit phases together.
There are also two absences noted: Ross Barkley is out with a knee injury, and Evann Guessand is away on international duty until 19/01/2026. That trims the attacking rotation a touch, and puts a little more weight on the starting attackers to keep the threat consistent.
Forest’s possible lineup reads: John Victor; Nicolò Savona, Murillo, Nikola Milenkovic, Neco Williams; Elliot Anderson, Nicolás Domínguez; Omari Hutchinson, Morgan Gibbs-White, Callum Hudson-Odoi; Igor Jesus.
The shape implied by that selection fits with Forest’s formation summary, which shows 4-2-3-1 as their go-to. Anderson and Domínguez as the double pivot suggests legs and distribution, while Gibbs-White sits at the centre of the creative picture with Hudson-Odoi and Hutchinson offering the width. Forest’s style notes point to crossing often, playing with width, and spending time in the opposition half — a combination that can look ambitious on paper, and demands a lot of discipline when the ball turns over.
How the Match Could Be Played
Villa’s profile hints at a game plan built on control first, incision second. The passing and possession numbers support that: 11,582 total passes with 86% accuracy and 54% possession across their played games, alongside 305 total shots (11.73 per game). If that base is replicated here, Kamara and Tielemans should see a lot of the ball, with Villa looking to draw Forest’s first line forward before playing through it.
That’s where Rogers and McGinn matter. Rogers’ output (seven goals, three assists) suggests end product from the attacking midfield band, and he looks the obvious candidate to receive between Forest’s midfield and defence, turn, and slide the kind of through ball Villa are explicitly associated with attempting often. Watkins’ role then becomes twofold: stretch the line with runs, and provide a clean option when Villa want to go direct for a spell to change the rhythm.
Forest’s width is likely to be the counter-argument. With Williams and Savona named in the back line, and Hudson-Odoi plus Hutchinson in the wide attacking slots, their natural routes take the ball outside and then back in — crosses, cutbacks, and long shots are all part of the description. That might be a deliberate way to test Villa’s listed weaknesses: defending set pieces, avoiding individual errors, and defending against long shots. If Forest can pin Villa back with repeated wide deliveries and second balls, they can make the match uncomfortable without needing to dominate possession.
The tactical tension, then, could sit in the transitions. Villa’s strengths include creating chances through individual skill and through balls, but they’re also marked as vulnerable to skillful players and prone to individual errors. Forest, for their part, are also marked as weak at avoiding individual errors and defending set pieces, and they’re flagged as weak at finishing scoring chances. That combination can create a slightly chaotic game-state: chances arriving, but the question being whether either side can take them cleanly.
Watch for where the ball is won. Villa are described as non-aggressive, and Forest are too, which suggests neither side is built on constant all-out pressing. That doesn’t mean passive — it can mean selective triggers. For Villa, the cue might be a loose touch from the Forest double pivot or a wide pass into a full-back that invites pressure from McGinn or Rogers. For Forest, the cue may be Villa trying to play short under pressure, especially with opponents noted as playing aggressively against them. If Forest can force a couple of hurried decisions in Villa’s first phase, it gives Gibbs-White and Hudson-Odoi shooting positions around the box — a direct way to probe Villa’s issues defending long shots.
In terms of zones, Villa’s “attack through the middle” note suggests they’ll try to own central pockets, even if the final action arrives out wide via Cash or Maatsen. Forest’s “play with width” and “attacking down the left” hints at them favouring that flank, which could bring Hudson-Odoi and Williams into the action most often. That sets up a key contest: can Villa’s right side — Cash behind McGinn — manage repeated wide attacks without giving away cheap set pieces in dangerous areas, another listed weakness?
Set pieces could be the messy decider. Both teams are marked as weak defending them, and both are weak in aerial duels. If the match becomes a stream of corners and free kicks, the pattern may matter more than the reputation: who wins the second ball, who reacts quicker, who keeps their line. Villa’s tendency to play an offside trap adds a little extra jeopardy too — get it right and you squeeze the pitch; get it wrong and you gift a run in behind.
William Hill
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
BetMGM
Bet £10 Get £40 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
bet365
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Betfred
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
10bet
100% Up To £50 On First Deposit
Show Terms & Conditions
The Numbers That Support the Story
Villa’s league position is backed up by output: 30 Premier League goals in 19 games, alongside 11.5 shots per game in that competition. That volume suggests they can build sustained attacking phases, and it fits with the idea of a side that can create chances via through balls and individual skill. Forest, by comparison, have 18 Premier League goals from 19 games, despite taking 12.5 shots per game — a combination that mirrors the note about finishing scoring chances being a weakness. Put simply: they get into shooting positions, but converting them has been the problem, which matters if this becomes a game of swings.
Possession and passing are close enough to keep the contest competitive in midfield: Villa are listed at 54% possession with 86% passing accuracy, Forest at 52% possession with 84% accuracy. That narrows the gap and hints Forest won’t necessarily be pinned deep for 90 minutes. The difference may come from where the possession happens: Villa’s preference for middle lanes against Forest’s width-first approach.
The recent match patterns also feed the feel of this one. Villa’s last six shows five wins and one defeat, while Forest’s last six shows two wins and four defeats. And at Villa Park, the hosts’ recent home record is emphatic: six home wins from six listed matches, plus a broader trend of 10 straight home wins in all competitions. That matters tactically because it supports the idea of Villa being able to dictate the “default” game-state at home: long spells in the opposition half, patient circulation, and repeated entries into the box.
There’s also a goals-story bubbling away. Villa have seen both teams score in each of their last seven matches in all competitions, which hints at openness at both ends — consistent threat, but also consistent concession. If that continues, Forest’s shot volume (336 total shots, 12.92 per game) becomes relevant even if their finishing hasn’t been. They won’t need a dozen perfect actions; they might only need one loose moment.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first real momentum swing could come from how Villa respond after conceding territory. They’re marked as very strong at coming back from losing positions and strong at protecting the lead — two traits that speak to game management across different states. If Forest start brightly with width and early crosses, Villa’s ability to ride that and then reassert control through Kamara and Tielemans will set the tone.
Another moment is the battle of the No.10 spaces. Rogers and Gibbs-White both arrive with three assists-or-goal contributions listed in their own ways — Rogers with seven goals and three assists, Gibbs-White with three goals and one assist — and both sit at the heart of how their teams connect midfield to attack. If either side can keep their creator facing forwards, the match accelerates quickly. If they’re forced to receive back-to-goal, it becomes a slower, wider grind.
Then there’s the set-piece danger. With both teams flagged as weak at defending set pieces and aerial duels, a single corner sequence — the first header, the second ball, the blocked shot — could decide far more than it should. Villa’s 132 corners across their played games and Forest’s 138 suggest both teams get into positions to rack them up, which is another reason that dead-ball organisation may matter.
Finally, keep an eye on long-shot moments. Villa are marked as weak defending against long shots, while Forest explicitly “take long shots” and are also weak defending against long shots themselves. That’s a neat recipe for a game where the ball breaks on the edge of the box and somebody fancies it. Sometimes football is just that simple — and sometimes it’s that cruel.
What could go wrong with this read? Plenty. A match that looks like it should be shaped by controlled possession can turn on one early error, especially with both sides marked as vulnerable to individual mistakes. And if the first goal arrives from a set piece or a deflection, the rest of the tactical script can get ripped up in minutes.
Best Bet for Aston Villa vs Nottingham Forest
[bt4y_article_veil]
Aston Villa to win and both teams to score
The logic for a home win starts with the formidable record established at Villa Park. The hosts have secured victory in each of their last six matches at this venue and have maintained a perfect run of 10 consecutive home wins across all competitions. This dominance is supported by a high-functioning attack that averages 11.5 shots per game and has produced 30 Premier League goals in 19 fixtures. Sitting 3rd in the table with 39 points, they hold a significant 21-point advantage over their visitors, who occupy 17th place.
However, a clean sheet for the home side appears unlikely based on recent defensive trends. Both teams to score has occurred in each of Aston Villa’s last seven matches, indicating a persistent vulnerability despite their winning habit. This aligns with specific defensive weaknesses, notably a struggle to defend against long shots and set pieces. Nottingham Forest, while struggling for points, are not shy about attacking; they actually average more shots per game (12.5) than Villa and possess creative wide players like Callum Hudson-Odoi and Morgan Gibbs-White who are instructed to cross often and take long-range efforts.
Furthermore, both teams are identified as having weaknesses in aerial duels and defending dead-ball situations. Given that Forest have accumulated 138 corners this season and Villa have 132, the match is likely to provide ample opportunities for chaotic moments in the box. While Forest’s finishing has been a noted weakness—scoring only 18 goals from 19 games—the consistency with which Villa concede suggests the visitors will find a breakthrough. Ultimately, the gulf in quality and Villa’s historical home strength should see them outscore a Forest side that has suffered four defeats in their last six outings.
What could go wrong The primary risk to this selection is Forest’s inefficiency in front of goal. While they create shot volume, their inability to convert high-quality chances could lead to a Villa win to nil if the visitors fail to capitalize on set-piece opportunities. Conversely, if Villa suffer a “hangover” from their recent 4-1 defeat at Arsenal and commit the individual errors they are prone to, Forest could frustrate them and play for a low-scoring draw.
Correct score lean: 2-1
A 2-1 victory for the home side perfectly mirrors the statistical landscape of this fixture. It respects Aston Villa’s undisputed status as favorites at Villa Park, where they have won 10 straight games, while acknowledging their inability to keep the opposition out lately. Given that Villa have seen both teams score in seven consecutive matches, a clean sheet is statistically improbable. A single-goal margin also reflects the tactical vulnerabilities both sides share regarding set pieces and individual errors, suggesting a competitive contest where Villa’s superior attacking personnel—specifically Morgan Rogers and Ollie Watkins—provide the decisive edge over a persistent but less clinical Forest attack.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
| |
New cust. Deposit £10+ in 7 days & bet on sports. Min odds apply. Reward = 4 x £10 Free Bets (2 x £10 Bet Builders & 2 x £10 Sports bet). Valid 7 days. Free bets not valid on e-sports & non UK/IE horse racing. 18+. T&Cs apply. | |
| |
Open Account Offer - New Customers only. Bet £10 and get £30 in Free Bets when you join bet365. Sign up, deposit between £5 and £10 to your account and bet365 will give you three times that value in Free Bets when you place qualifying bets to the same value settle. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits. Min odds/bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. T&Cs , time limits & exclusions apply. Registration Required. #Ad. 18+ Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+. Play Safe. From 00:01 on 18.10.2022. £30 bonus. New customers only. Minimum £10 stake on odds of 1/2 (1.5) or greater on sportsbook (excluding Virtual markets). Further terms apply. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New customers only. Register, deposit with Debit Card, and place first bet £10+ at Evens (2.0)+ on Sports within 7 days to get 3 x £10 in Sports Free Bets & 2 x £10 in Acca Free Bets within 10 hours of settlement. 7-day expiry. Eligibility exclusions & T&Cs Apply. | |
| |
New cust only. Opt-in required. Deposit & place a bet within 7 days and settle a £10 minimum bet at odds of 4/5 (1.8) or greater to be credited with 3 x £10 Free Bets: 1 x £10 horse racing, 1 x £10 Free Bet Builder and 1 x £10 football. Free Bets cannot be used on e-sports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 7 day expiry. Stake not returned. 18+. T&Cs apply. Acca Club: Available to new & existing customers. 3 or more selections. Min Odds: 3/10 (1.3) per leg. Max stake: £500. Max Winnings: £200,000 per boost. Profit Boost amounts vary. Horse Racing, Greyhounds & Trotting excluded. Exclusions apply. Full T&C’s apply. 18+ GambleAware.org. | |
 | |
New members only. £10+ bet on sports (ex. Virtuals) 1.5 min odds, settled within 14 days. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days; £20 use on sportsbook, £10 on Bet Builder. Stake not returned. T&Cs.+ deposit exclusions apply #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New bettors. Select bonus at signup or use code SPORT. Wager deposit & bonus 8x. Max qualifying bet = bonus. Valid 60 days. Odds, bet & payment limits apply. T&Cs Apply; 18+ | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
New customers only, 18+. Min deposit £10. Place a £50 bet on any sport at 2.0+ to qualify for £25 in free bets and 10 Free Spins. Free Bets and Spins valid 7 days. £0.10 Free Spins. T&Cs apply. Please bet responsibly. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New members only. £10 min deposit & bet on sportsbook (ex. virtuals), placed & settled at 1.5 min odds in 14 days of sign-up. Win part of E/W bets. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days, use on sportsbook only (ex. virtuals), stakes not returned. T&Cs Apply and deposit exclusions apply. Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+ New customers only. Opt in, and bet £10 on football markets (odds 2.00+). No cash out. Get 6x£5 football free bets at specified odds for set markets, which expire after 7 days. Offer valid from 12:00 UK Time on 25/08/2023. Card payments only. T&Cs Apply | gambleaware.org | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
