bet365
BetMGM
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
EasyBet
A Meeting Between Survival Stress and Promotion Energy. Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
TPV Tampere welcome JJK Jyväskylä to Kauppi 2 Tekonurmi on 5 July 2026, with kick-off set for 19:00 in 19-degree conditions.
TPV vs JJK — bet365 Market Snapshot
Swipe through key markets with illustrative probabilities and sample bet365 odds based on our match analysis.
JJK’s league position of second place highlights a massive seventeen-point table gap over twelfth-placed TPV, formatting their strong favouritism.
JJK’s last four Ykkonen league fixtures have all hit over 2.5 goals, demonstrating their consistent high-scoring profile.
TPV average 1.92 goals conceded per game, aligning perfectly with a multi-goal victory expectation for the visitors.
JJK control 52% of the ball relative to TPV’s 41% average, allowing the visitors to dictate match tempo.
Three Punchy Stats
- JJK have scored 35 goals in 13 regular-season matches, while TPV have conceded 23 in 12. That attacking-versus-defensive contrast is the clearest reason this fixture feels tilted towards the visitors.
- TPV have won only one of their last 12 Ykkonen matches and have conceded in each of their last 10. That is not just poor form; it is a trend that can weigh heavily on decision-making.
- JJK’s last four Ykkonen matches have all produced over 2.5 goals, and they recently beat Inter Turku II 11-1. They are carrying the kind of attacking threat that can turn a nervous match into a wild one very quickly.
Match Volume: Average Shots per Game
The total shooting volume highlights a major difference in how frequently each side attempts to breach opposition defensive lines.
They create fewer shooting opportunities per fixture, relying heavily on making separate chances count.
The visitors operate with a highly direct philosophy, peppering opposition goalkeepers constantly throughout 90 minutes.
Territorial Intensity: Dangerous Attacks per Match
Dangerous attacks track how efficiently each group moves possession into areas where critical defensive errors occur.
Their build-up play remains lower in relative volume, which often leaves forward lines isolated.
The travelling team consistently forces local defences deep into their own territory via continuous attacking waves.
On paper, this is a meeting between 12th and 2nd in Finland’s Ykkonen regular season, but that only tells half the story. The emotional temperature is likely to feel much higher than the weather.
TPV are stuck near the bottom with 7 points from 12 games, having won just once, drawn four and lost seven. Their goal difference of minus 11 reflects a side still trying to find balance between staying compact and offering enough attacking threat. JJK, by contrast, arrive in 2nd place with 24 points from 13 matches, built on seven wins, three draws and three defeats. They have scored 35 league goals already, which gives this fixture a sharp contrast: one team is trying to stop the bleeding, the other is trying to keep the engine roaring.
And yes, football can be cruel. TPV are not merely looking for points here; they are looking for a match that does not drift into another familiar pattern. JJK are the more productive side, the more dangerous side, and the side carrying far better table momentum. But that does not mean this is a gentle evening stroll for them. Their away form is mixed enough to keep a little tension in the air, and TPV have drawn three of their last six home matches. Not glamorous, perhaps, but awkward? Absolutely.
The Table Tells a Blunt Story
The standings make uncomfortable reading for TPV. After 12 games, they have scored 12 and conceded 23, averaging exactly 1.00 goal scored per game and 1.92 conceded. That is a rough exchange rate. You do not need a coaching badge to know that conceding almost twice per match while scoring once creates a weekly uphill climb.
JJK’s numbers are much stronger, even if not flawless. Across 14 games in all listed competitions, they have scored 36 goals at an average of 2.57 per game, while conceding 23 at 1.64 per match. That combination makes them exciting and slightly chaotic. They are not locking games down like a bank vault; they are more like a sports car with a brilliant engine and a worrying noise under the bonnet. Great fun, unless you are the manager watching transitions open up.
The league table reinforces that identity. JJK’s 35 goals in 13 regular-season games are a major reason they sit second, with a goal difference of plus 14. TPV’s 12 goals and 23 conceded leave them 12th, and the gap between the sides is already 17 points. That is not a small difference. It is a canyon with football boots on.
Recent Form: TPV Searching, JJK Swinging
TPV enter this match without a win in their last six. They have drawn three and lost three, scoring eight and conceding 14 in that run. The sequence is revealing: a 2-1 loss away to VJS, a 2-2 draw at PK Keski Uusimaa, a 1-1 home draw with Inter Turku II, a 3-0 home defeat to Tampere Utd, a 4-2 loss at SalPa Salo, and a 2-2 home draw with OLS Oulu.
There is fight in those results, but also frustration. TPV have shown they can score, yet they have not shown they can control matches for long enough. Their recent games suggest they often remain alive, often competitive, but rarely secure. That is a painful place to live as a team: always close enough to hope, but too open to relax.
JJK arrive with a livelier recent record. Their last six show three wins, one draw and two defeats. The standout result is impossible to ignore: an 11-1 demolition of Inter Turku II. That was not just a win; that was football vandalism with a scoreboard. They also beat KPV Kokkola 3-2 away and OLS Oulu 1-0 at home, while losing 3-1 to PK Keski Uusimaa and 1-0 to Tampere Utd, and drawing 2-2 with VJS.
That mix tells us plenty. JJK can overwhelm opponents, but they can also be dragged into messy games. Their last four Ykkonen matches have all gone over 2.5 goals, which fits the profile of a side with plenty of attacking volume but enough defensive looseness to make things interesting.
Home and Away Patterns Could Shape the Match
TPV’s home form is not strong, but it is not completely hopeless either. In their last six home matches, they have won one, drawn three and lost two. They beat VJS 3-1, drew 0-0 with KPV Kokkola, lost 0-2 to FC Jazz, drew 2-2 with OLS Oulu, lost 0-3 to Tampere Utd and drew 1-1 with Inter Turku II.
That pattern hints at a side capable of stubborn resistance but vulnerable when the first defensive structure breaks. TPV’s home concession average in Ykkonen sits at 1.50, and they have conceded at least once in each of their last 10 Ykkonen matches overall. That streak is the sort of thing defenders hate seeing repeated because it becomes psychological as much as tactical. Every clearance feels heavier. Every cross feels louder.
JJK’s away record is perfectly split across the latest six: three wins and three defeats. They beat KuPS Akatemia 2-1, FC Jazz 2-0 and KPV Kokkola 3-2, but lost to PEPO, OLS Oulu and Tampere Utd. There have been no draws in that away run, which gives this fixture a sharper edge. JJK tend to travel with purpose, but not always with control.
Their average concession rate away in Ykkonen is also 1.50, so TPV should not treat this as a match where the visiting goal is locked behind three passwords and a security guard. There may be chances. The problem is whether TPV can take them before JJK’s heavier attacking rhythm starts to tell.
Tactical Picture: Volume Against Vulnerability
The most obvious tactical contrast comes in attacking output. TPV average 11.08 shots per game from 133 total shots, while JJK average 16.43 from 230 total shots. JJK also have a better on-target share, with 48% of their shots hitting the target compared with TPV’s 39%. That matters because this match could be decided not simply by who has possession, but by who converts territory into repeatable danger.
JJK also lead in possession, averaging 52% compared with TPV’s 41%. That suggests they are more comfortable controlling phases and sustaining pressure. TPV may need to be selective, protecting central areas, avoiding cheap turnovers, and using moments of transition carefully. Their average first goal time is 55 minutes, while JJK’s is 41 minutes. In simple terms, JJK tend to strike earlier, and TPV tend to take longer to land a blow. If that pattern continues, the home side could find themselves chasing the match again.
The territorial numbers also tilt towards JJK. They have made 1328 total attacks at an average of 94.86 per game, compared with TPV’s 1101 and 91.75. In dangerous attacks, the gap is clearer: JJK have 956 at 68.29 per game, while TPV have 713 at 59.42. That is where this match may be won or lost. JJK do not just shoot more; they create more sustained pressure in areas where mistakes become expensive.
TPV’s corner numbers are slightly higher on average, with 6.58 per game compared with JJK’s 6.36, so set-piece situations could provide one of their best routes into the contest. In matches where open-play control is difficult, corners become little invitations to chaos. TPV may need to RSVP enthusiastically.
Head-to-Head: JJK Hold the Emotional Edge
Recent and past meetings also favour JJK. Across the listed head-to-head record, TPV have not won any of the six matches, with two draws and four JJK victories. JJK won the latest meeting 2-1 on 18 April 2026, despite TPV leading 1-0 at half-time. That result matters because it adds emotional weight to the rematch. TPV know they have been in front against this opponent and still walked away empty-handed. That hurts.
The previous meetings include another 2-1 JJK win in 2020, a 2-0 JJK win in 2008, a 1-1 draw in July 2008, a 3-0 JJK win in 2007, and a 1-1 draw in May 2007. The pattern is blunt: TPV have found ways to compete in patches, but not to finish the job.
Discipline and Game Management
There is also a discipline angle. TPV have collected four red cards and 22 yellow cards across 12 games, averaging 0.33 reds and 1.83 yellows per match. JJK have one red card and 29 yellows across 14 games, averaging 0.07 reds and 2.07 yellows. TPV’s red-card rate is the more alarming figure. Against a side as attack-minded as JJK, playing with emotional fire is useful; playing with too much fire is how you burn your own kitchen down.
Fouls are also part of the picture, with TPV averaging 4.75 per game and JJK 5.29. This may not become a stop-start battle by default, but if TPV are forced to defend long spells, tactical fouls and late pressure moments could become important.
Final Thoughts: TPV Need Control, JJK Need Ruthlessness
For TPV, this match is about resistance, timing and emotional discipline. They cannot afford to let the game become a running contest from the first whistle, because JJK have the stronger attacking numbers, the higher shot volume and the more reliable scoring record. TPV’s best route is to stay compact, use set pieces well, and make JJK uncomfortable in the moments when the visitors’ defensive openness appears.
For JJK, the task is different. They must turn superiority into authority. Their numbers are strong, their league position is strong, and their attacking profile is far more convincing. But their away record is split, and they have conceded enough to remind everyone that this is not a side immune to trouble. They should expect TPV to fight, because bottom-half teams rarely hand over points politely. Football is not a dinner party; nobody is passing the salt with a smile.
Still, the story of this match is difficult to ignore. TPV are trying to stop a long winless rhythm from becoming a season-defining burden. JJK are trying to keep pressure near the top and prove that their attacking power travels. At Kauppi 2 Tekonurmi, that contrast should make for a tense, emotional and potentially very revealing Ykkonen contest.
📊 Market Explainer
Match Result Market (1X2)
The Match Result market requires selecting one of three definitive outcomes: a home victory (1), a draw (X), or an away victory (2) at the conclusion of standard regulation time. This traditional platform functions as a straightforward evaluation of primary match superiority. Cautious strategies might lean toward backing dominant travel trends, while higher-risk approaches seek inflated returns on home resistance.
Correct Score Market
The Correct Score market tasks analysts with identifying the exact final scoreline at full-time. Due to the high mathematical variance involved, this market naturally offers larger prices alongside increased volatility. Single-goal variations can transform outcomes late in play, meaning game-state changes and defensive fatigue play huge roles in the viability of the selection.
⚔️ Pick 1: JJK to Win Rationale
JJK carry undeniable table authority into this fixture, positioned second in the standings with 24 points compared to TPV who reside in twelfth place with 7 points. This seventeen-point gap highlights a clear mismatch in offensive capability. JJK have established themselves as a highly productive attacking force, recording 35 regular-season goals across their 13 league fixtures. This heavy attacking volume is supported by an average of 16.43 shots per match, with an impressive 48% hitting the target. This consistency ensures sustained final-third pressure that should overwhelm the hosts.
📊 Tactical Indicators:
- JJK generate a superior territorial presence, averaging 68.29 dangerous attacks per fixture compared to TPV’s 59.42.
- TPV possess a vulnerable defensive structure, conceding 23 goals across 12 matches, which averages out to 1.92 concessions per game.
- The hosts are currently experiencing a six-match winless run, highlighting difficulties in securing positive outcomes.
Risk Factor: JJK’s away form remains perfectly split with three wins and three defeats, meaning their defensive looseness can sometimes expose them on the road if transitions are not handled smoothly.
⚔️ Pick 2: JJK to Win 3-1 Rationale
Targeting a high-scoring away victory aligns with the overarching statistical identities of both clubs. JJK average an impressive 2.57 goals per game across all competitions, showcasing an attack capable of striking early and often, particularly with an average first goal time of 41 minutes. However, the visitors are far from secure at the back, maintaining an away concession average of 1.50 goals per match. TPV have demonstrated that they can find the net at home, averaging exactly 1.00 goal per game overall, and scoring in recent scorelines such as their 2-2 draw with OLS Oulu and 2-2 draw with PK Keski Uusimaa.
Scoreline Probability Box
Given TPV’s trend of conceding in ten consecutive league matches alongside JJK’s habit of seeing their last four league games surpass the 2.5 goal line, a 3-1 outcome represents a highly plausible reflection of JJK’s attacking superiority balanced against their defensive vulnerabilities.
Risk Factor: Emotional discipline could be a challenge, as TPV have picked up four red cards this season, which could prematurely alter the game-state and disrupt open play patterns.
Key Tactical Mismatch
Averaging 16.43 shots per match with a 48% target accuracy, generating constant offensive output.
Conceding 1.92 goals per match and failing to secure a clean sheet in 10 consecutive league outings.
❓ Interactive Q&A Section
⊕What is the current table situation for TPV vs JJK?
JJK Jyväskylä sit in second place with 24 points while TPV Tampere reside in twelfth position with 7 points. This leaves a seventeen-point gap between the sides in the Ykkonen standings.
⊕How does the Match Result market operate?
The Match Result market requires a prediction on whether the home team wins, the match ends in a draw, or the away team wins. It is settled solely on the outcome at the end of standard regulation time.
⊕What makes JJK favourites to win this match?
JJK have scored 35 goals in 13 regular-season matches and won seven fixtures, making them heavy statistical favourites. TPV have won only once all season and are currently on a six-match winless streak.
⊕Why is a high-scoring correct scoreline like 3-1 plausible?
JJK average 2.57 goals per game across competitions but公 concede 1.50 goals on average when travelling. TPV have scored in recent fixtures and average 1.00 goal per game, making a 3-1 away win highly realistic.
⊕How consistently do TPV concede goals?
TPV have conceded at least one goal in each of their last ten consecutive Ykkonen league matches. They average 1.92 goals conceded per game across the regular season.
⊕What are the primary shot metrics for both teams?
JJK average 16.43 shots per match with a 48% accuracy rate on target. TPV average 11.08 shots per match with a 39% accuracy rate.
⊕What happened in the last meeting between these teams?
JJK won the latest head-to-head meeting 2-1 on 18 April 2026. TPV held a 1-0 lead at half-time before the visitors turned the match around.
⊕How dominant are JJK in controlling possession?
JJK control an average of 52% possession during their games, allowing them to dictate play. TPV average 41% possession, meaning they spend long phases defending.
Last Odds Update: Feb 10, 14:20 GMT · Editorial Policy
18+ | GambleAware | T&Cs apply
Please gamble responsibly. Always set a budget, use strict deposit limits, and stop playing immediately when it is no longer fun.
