bet365
BetMGM
William Hill
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
Will Angola’s possession game break Zimbabwe’s resistance in Group B? Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
To use the Live Streaming service you will need to be logged in and have a funded account or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. Geo location and live streaming rules apply.
Works worldwide • Email + on-site access • Instant unlock
▾
Angola's technical superiority is reflected in their 55% average possession and 83% pass accuracy. They average 11.13 shots per game, with 65% coming from inside the box, suggesting they create the high-quality chances necessary to win tight group games. Zimbabwe struggle for offensive volume, averaging only seven shots per match and scoring in less than half of their recent fixtures. With Angola’s defensive record standing at a robust 0.84 concessions per game, they are well-placed to control this neutral-site clash and exploit Zimbabwe's lower technical consistency.
▾
Angola's matches are frequently defined by defensive stability, as seen in their 0.84 goals-per-game concession rate. Zimbabwe rely heavily on shots from outside the box (58%), a strategy that is less effective against disciplined defenses. While Zimbabwe showed resilience against Egypt, their overall scoring frequency of 48% suggests they will find it difficult to breach Angola's backline. A 1–0 victory reflects Angola's ability to manufacture a decisive moment through their high volume of dangerous attacks while maintaining a clean sheet against a lower-volume offensive side.
Readers’ Tip
Vote your pick — quick & anonymous
Terms & Conditions (tap to view)
Angola vs Zimbabwe Predictions and Best Bets
Angola vs Zimbabwe — bet365 Market Snapshot
Current pricing and implied outcomes for the Group B encounter based on technical analysis.
Angola’s technical control makes them favorites at Marrakech, though the market respects Zimbabwe’s recent defensive resilience.
Pricing points towards a narrow contest where Angola’s defensive solidity often leads to low-scoring victories.
- Angola’s attacking weight shows in volume and territory: 2,839 total attacks and 1,721 dangerous attacks across 31 matches, alongside 162 corners, point to sustained pressure spells.
- Goal output contrast is stark over the longer run: Angola have 46 goals in 31 matches (1.48 per game) while Zimbabwe have 16 in 21 (0.76 per game).
- Shot geography tells you how each side searches for chances: Angola take 65% of shots inside the box, but Zimbabwe take 58% from outside, hinting at different routes to goal.
Technical Control: Possession & Accuracy
Angola’s ability to keep the ball and sustain pressure is a central pillar of their tactical approach.
A superior completion rate allows Angola to dictate tempo and control the middle of the pitch.
Lower accuracy often reflects a more direct, riskier approach to finding forward options.
Chance Quality: Shot Location
This identifies which team is more effective at penetrating the opponent’s penalty area.
Angola consistently prioritize working the ball into high-percentage scoring zones.
A heavy reliance on long-range strikes suggests difficulty in breaking down organized defenses.
Angola and Zimbabwe come back around quickly in Group B of the Africa Cup of Nations, meeting at Stade de Marrakech on 26/12/2025 with a 19:30 kick-off listed. After one game each, the table has both sides on zero points, both with a goal scored and two conceded: Angola sit third and Zimbabwe fourth, separated only by the order of the list rather than anything on the pitch that’s been definitive so far.
That shared start matters. South Africa and Egypt have already put three points on the board, so this one has the feel of an early fork in the road. Angola arrive off a 2–1 defeat to South Africa on 22/12/2025, while Zimbabwe were beaten 2–1 by Egypt the same day. Not a disaster for either, but a reminder that small moments and small mistakes get punished quickly in a group where the early pace-setters have already moved.
There’s also an unusual edge to the staging: a neutral venue feel at Stade de Marrakech, and no head-to-head history is listed here to lean on. That strips things back to what these teams have shown recently — how they try to build attacks, where their shots come from, and whether they can keep the game in the zones they prefer. In a group match where both need traction, the shape of the contest could matter as much as the scoreline.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Angola’s most recent Africa Cup of Nations outing provides the clearest guide to who’s likely to be trusted again. Several players logged the full 90 minutes: Hugo Marques in goal, with Kialonda Gaspar, Jonathan Buatu and Clinton Mata among those also completing the match. In front of them, Tó Carneiro played 90, while Fredy and Maestro both featured for 86 minutes. In attack, Zito Luvumbo played 90 and Gelson Dala and M’Bala Nzola both went 76. Show also played 90 — and scored — which immediately frames him as a key figure in how Angola balance the middle of the pitch, because goals from that area can change the arithmetic of the whole game.
The substitutions also hint at Angola’s options and timing. Mabululu got 14 minutes, Milson 14, Beni four, Randy Nteka four, and Chico Banza one. That suggests Angola were managing minutes and roles carefully, rather than chucking on changes at random, and it gives a clue about the type of bench impact they may look for again: short, sharp bursts rather than wholesale reshuffles.
Zimbabwe’s last Africa Cup of Nations match points to a similarly settled XI. Washington Arubi played the full 90 in goal and posted a standout rating. Teenage Hadebe, Munashe Garan’anga and Gerald Takwara all completed the match, while Emmanuel Jalai played 88 and contributed an assist. In midfield, Marvelous Nakamba played 90 and Jonah Fabisch also completed the full match. Up front, Prince Dube played 72 minutes and scored, with Daniel Msendami also on 72, and Washington Navaya featuring for 46.
From the bench, Macauley Bonne played 45, Tawanda Chirewa 18, Prosper Padera 18, and Tawanda Maswanhise two. That pattern points to Zimbabwe having at least one forward option they’re willing to turn to early in the second half, and it suggests a plan that can shift once the first hour has been negotiated.
No formations are listed, so the safest read is about roles and tendencies: Angola look equipped to keep the ball and build methodically, while Zimbabwe’s selection contains a clear defensive midfield presence and multiple forward options to rotate the front line.
How the Match Could Be Played
Angola’s broader profile points towards control through the ball. Across 31 matches, they average 55% possession and complete passes at 83% accuracy, with 6,112 total passes (197.16 per game). That kind of share doesn’t guarantee dominance — but it usually means Angola want the game played in front of them, with opponents forced to shuffle, reset, and defend repeated phases.
Zimbabwe’s numbers point to a different rhythm. Across 21 matches, they sit at 48% possession, with 2,127 total passes (101.29 per game) and a 78% accuracy rate. The obvious tactical implication is that Zimbabwe may accept having less of the ball, then try to make their possessions count: fewer passes, quicker progression, and more direct routes into shooting positions.
Where it gets interesting is how those styles collide in the final third. Angola average 11.13 shots per game (345 total), and 65% of their attempts come from inside the box. That says Angola are willing to work the ball into danger areas rather than settling for speculative efforts, and it also suggests they like getting bodies into the area to create close-range chances. Zimbabwe, by contrast, average seven shots per game (147 total) and take only 42% of their attempts from inside the box, with 58% from outside. That doesn’t automatically mean “long shots and hope”, but it does imply that Angola’s defensive structure will be tested more by second balls and edge-of-area strikes than by constant cut-backs from the byline.
This could become a match about where Zimbabwe can win their duels. If Angola’s passing rhythm is allowed to settle, Zimbabwe may find themselves chasing. Angola also rack up a high volume of attacking actions: 2,839 total attacks (91.58 per game) and 1,721 dangerous attacks (55.52 per game). Zimbabwe’s totals are lower but still busy: 1,714 total attacks (81.62 per game) and 989 dangerous attacks (47.1 per game). That gap matters because dangerous attacks are the sequences that tend to lead to corners, shots, and sustained pressure — the stuff that keeps a defence turning and turning until a crack appears.
Set-piece territory could be another lever. Angola average 5.23 corners per match (162 total), while Zimbabwe average four (84 total). Corners aren’t a guarantee of goals, but they are a repeatable way to camp in the opposition third, and in a match where both sides have already conceded twice after one group game, the ability to manufacture pressure without over-committing in open play is a tidy advantage.
The match might also be decided by patience with the first goal. Angola’s “average event time” lists the first goal at 48’ for them, while Zimbabwe’s shows 41’. Even if those are rough averages rather than a script, they hint at a game that can simmer before it boils. The team that stays emotionally level in that simmering phase — not rushing passes, not diving into challenges — might end up with the cleaner chances once legs and spacing begin to drift.
William Hill
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
BetMGM
Bet £10 Get £40 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
bet365
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Betfred
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
10bet
100% Up To £50 On First Deposit
Show Terms & Conditions
The Numbers That Support the Story
Angola’s overall record across 31 matches is built on a solid defensive base: 46 goals scored (1.48 per game) and only 26 conceded (0.84 per game). Zimbabwe, across 21 matches, have scored 16 (0.76 per game) and conceded 23 (1.1 per game). Those averages suggest Angola are more accustomed to dictating outcomes at both ends: creating enough to score regularly, while keeping concessions down.
Goal frequency backs that up. Angola have scored in 24 of their last 31 matches (77%), while Zimbabwe have scored in 10 of their last 21 (48%). That doesn’t mean Zimbabwe can’t score — they’ve already scored once in this tournament — but it does underline the kind of game they may prefer: one where their defensive work keeps them close enough that a single big moment can be enough.
The shot location splits give another layer. Angola’s 65% inside-the-box share suggests they can craft the type of chances that demand last-ditch defending. Zimbabwe’s 58% outside-the-box share suggests they may need to win territory and rebounds to create their best looks. That can become a battle of zones: Angola trying to enter the box with control, Zimbabwe trying to block access and tempt shots from range.
Then there’s the discipline and duels side of the contest. Angola average 10.45 fouls and 6.19 tackles per match, with 51 yellow cards and two reds across 31 games. Zimbabwe average 7.33 fouls and six tackles, with 38 yellows and one red across 21 games. A match like this can easily swing if it becomes stop-start and niggly — especially if the midfield is constantly broken up — because it can blunt Angola’s passing rhythm and turn the evening into a set-piece and second-ball fight.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first moment is Angola’s ability to translate possession into the right kind of shots. They take 11.13 shots per match and most come from inside the box, but the game will hinge on whether those entries are clean and balanced, or whether Zimbabwe can force rushed finishes and blocks. Angola’s blocked-shots figure sits at 63 total (2.03 per game), so Zimbabwe’s willingness to put bodies in the way could become a theme.
The second is Zimbabwe’s route to goal. With just seven shots per match on average and a majority from outside the box, they may need their best spells to come in transition: winning the ball, playing forward early, and letting attackers like Prince Dube — who scored in the last group match — attack space before Angola’s defensive shape resets. If Zimbabwe’s forwards are receiving with their backs to goal and no runners nearby, those attacks can fizzle fast.
The third is how the second half is managed. Angola used a run of small late substitutions last time, while Zimbabwe brought on Macauley Bonne for a full 45 minutes and still had energy to add two more substitutes for 18 each. If the match is level on the hour, those patterns matter: fresh legs can change pressing intensity, change the tempo of counter-attacks, and alter the feeling of control.
What could go wrong with this read? A single early goal can flip the match away from its natural tendencies, forcing one side into risks they’d rather avoid. And when both teams have already played a 2–1 match in the group, fine margins in both boxes — a deflection, a rebound, a moment of confusion — can matter more than the neat logic of how the contest “should” look.
Best Bet for Angola vs Zimbabwe
Works worldwide • Email + on-site access • Instant unlock
Angola to win
The competitive logic for this encounter in Marrakech leans toward a side that maintains superior control through possession and technical efficiency. Angola average 55% possession across their broader run of results, completing passes with an 83% accuracy rate. This ability to dictate the tempo contrasts sharply with Zimbabwe, whose average possession sits lower at 48% with a 78% passing accuracy. In a high-stakes group match where both teams are desperate for points after opening defeats, the team capable of sustaining long phases of play is generally better positioned to manufacture a breakthrough.
Furthermore, the quality of chance creation provides a distinct advantage for the Sable Antelopes. They average 11.13 shots per game, with a substantial 65% of those attempts originating from inside the penalty area. This reflects a disciplined offensive structure that prioritises working the ball into high-value zones. Zimbabwe, by comparison, manage only seven shots per game and rely heavily on speculative efforts, with 58% of their strikes coming from outside the box. This reliance on long-range efficiency makes it significantly harder to break down an organized defensive unit like Angola’s, which has conceded just 0.84 goals per game across 31 fixtures.
Territorial pressure also supports an Angolan victory. They average over 55 dangerous attacks per match and manufacture more opportunities from the corner flag, averaging 5.23 corners compared to Zimbabwe’s four. With the hosts scoring in 77% of their recent matches while Zimbabwe have hit the net in just 48% of theirs, the historical and statistical output suggests Angola possess the variety and offensive volume required to secure three points.
What could go wrong Tournament football often rewards clinical finishing over sustained pressure. Zimbabwe’s stubborn defensive performance against Egypt, spearheaded by Washington Arubi’s sharp reflexes, proved that they can absorb pressure for long periods. If Angola fail to convert their high-percentage box entries early, they may become vulnerable to Zimbabwe’s direct counter-attacks or a set-piece moment from Prince Dube, who has already proven his scoring touch in this group.
Correct score lean
Angola 1–0 Zimbabwe
A narrow 1–0 victory for Angola is highly consistent with the defensive profiles and scoring patterns of both nations. Angola have established themselves as a remarkably tight defensive unit, conceding only 0.84 goals per game on average. Zimbabwe’s scoring frequency is relatively low at 48%, and they rely heavily on shots from outside the box, which are statistically less likely to result in goals against a settled backline. Given that Angola average 1.48 goals per match but are facing a resilient Zimbabwean defence that thwarted elite attackers for long stretches recently, a single-goal margin is the most justified outcome.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
| |
New cust. Deposit £10+ in 7 days & bet on sports. Min odds apply. Reward = 4 x £10 Free Bets (2 x £10 Bet Builders & 2 x £10 Sports bet). Valid 7 days. Free bets not valid on e-sports & non UK/IE horse racing. 18+. T&Cs apply. | |
| |
Open Account Offer - New Customers only. Bet £10 and get £30 in Free Bets when you join bet365. Sign up, deposit between £5 and £10 to your account and bet365 will give you three times that value in Free Bets when you place qualifying bets to the same value settle. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits. Min odds/bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. T&Cs , time limits & exclusions apply. Registration Required. #Ad. 18+ Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+. Play Safe. From 00:01 on 18.10.2022. £30 bonus. New customers only. Minimum £10 stake on odds of 1/2 (1.5) or greater on sportsbook (excluding Virtual markets). Further terms apply. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New customers only. Register, deposit with Debit Card, and place first bet £10+ at Evens (2.0)+ on Sports within 7 days to get 3 x £10 in Sports Free Bets & 2 x £10 in Acca Free Bets within 10 hours of settlement. 7-day expiry. Eligibility exclusions & T&Cs Apply. | |
| |
New cust only. Opt-in required. Deposit & place a bet within 7 days and settle a £10 minimum bet at odds of 4/5 (1.8) or greater to be credited with 3 x £10 Free Bets: 1 x £10 horse racing, 1 x £10 Free Bet Builder and 1 x £10 football. Free Bets cannot be used on e-sports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 7 day expiry. Stake not returned. 18+. T&Cs apply. Acca Club: Available to new & existing customers. 3 or more selections. Min Odds: 3/10 (1.3) per leg. Max stake: £500. Max Winnings: £200,000 per boost. Profit Boost amounts vary. Horse Racing, Greyhounds & Trotting excluded. Exclusions apply. Full T&C’s apply. 18+ GambleAware.org. | |
 | |
New members only. £10+ bet on sports (ex. Virtuals) 1.5 min odds, settled within 14 days. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days; £20 use on sportsbook, £10 on Bet Builder. Stake not returned. T&Cs.+ deposit exclusions apply #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New bettors. Select bonus at signup or use code SPORT. Wager deposit & bonus 8x. Max qualifying bet = bonus. Valid 60 days. Odds, bet & payment limits apply. T&Cs Apply; 18+ | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
New customers only, 18+. Min deposit £10. Place a £50 bet on any sport at 2.0+ to qualify for £25 in free bets and 10 Free Spins. Free Bets and Spins valid 7 days. £0.10 Free Spins. T&Cs apply. Please bet responsibly. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New members only. £10 min deposit & bet on sportsbook (ex. virtuals), placed & settled at 1.5 min odds in 14 days of sign-up. Win part of E/W bets. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days, use on sportsbook only (ex. virtuals), stakes not returned. T&Cs Apply and deposit exclusions apply. Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+ New customers only. Opt in, and bet £10 on football markets (odds 2.00+). No cash out. Get 6x£5 football free bets at specified odds for set markets, which expire after 7 days. Offer valid from 12:00 UK Time on 25/08/2023. Card payments only. T&Cs Apply | gambleaware.org | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
