See form, H2H, goals trends and team data for Chelsea v Manchester City.
bet365
BetMGM
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
EasyBet
Chelsea
Manchester City
Chelsea
FA Cup
Manchester City
FA Cup
ChelseaFA CupManchester CityFA CupChelseaFA CupManchester CityFA CupChelseaFA CupManchester CityFA CupChelseaFA CupManchester CityFA CupChelseaFA CupManchester CityFA Cup
Chelsea
| Player | Apps | Min | Won | Committed | Yellow | Red | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 7.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 83 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 74 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 13 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Manchester City
| Player | Apps | Min | Won | Committed | Yellow | Red | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 4 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 65 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 45 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1 | 25 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chelsea
| Player | Apps | Min | Shots | On Target | Key Passes | Passes | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 19 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 37 | 7.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 50 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 82 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 31 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 42 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 32 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 86 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 15 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 46 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 74 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 13 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Manchester City
| Player | Apps | Min | Shots | On Target | Key Passes | Passes | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 63 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 25 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 62 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 11 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 16 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 39 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 93 | 7.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 49 | 7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 64 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 65 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 53 | 7 | |
| 1 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 45 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 36 | 7 | |
| 1 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 25 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chelsea
| Player | Apps | Min | Goals | Assists | On Target | Shots | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 83 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 74 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 16 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 10 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Manchester City
| Player | Apps | Min | Goals | Assists | On Target | Shots | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 3 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 7 | |
| 1 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chelsea
| Player | Apps | Min | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocks | Duels Won | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 3 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 2 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 6 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 2 | 0 | 2 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 6 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 86 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 83 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 2 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 74 | 2 | 1 | 0 | 4 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 16 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 13 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.2 | |
| 1 | 10 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Manchester City
| Player | Apps | Min | Tackles | Interceptions | Blocks | Duels Won | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 5 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 4 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 11 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 90 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 7 | 7.7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 7 | 7 | |
| 1 | 90 | 2 | 1 | 1 | 2 | 7.3 | |
| 1 | 65 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 7 | |
| 1 | 45 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 6.5 | |
| 1 | 45 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 3 | 7 | |
| 1 | 25 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 2 | 6.6 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | |||
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Chelsea
| Player | Apps | Min | Saves | Conceded | Yellow | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 4 | 1 | 0 | 6.9 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Manchester City
| Player | Apps | Min | Saves | Conceded | Yellow | Rating |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 90 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 6.7 | |
| 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
Under 1.5 Goals
IF Elfsborg v BK Hacken
The numbers point towards a game where clear chances may be harder to sustain, making under 1.5 the cleaner angle. It gives some margin for one side to edge ahead without needing the match to completely shut down. The market has landed in roughly 10% of the relevant sample, giving the selection a clearer statistical base.
Over 3.5 Goals
IFK Goteborg v Mjallby AIF
This fixture offers enough forward momentum to support over 3.5. The selection is less about chasing chaos and more about backing a game where chance volume can steadily build. The market has landed in roughly 50% of the relevant sample, giving the selection a clearer statistical base.
Under 1.5 Goals
Sandefjord v Fredrikstad
Sandefjord v Fredrikstad looks better suited to a controlled scoreline than a shootout. The under 1.5 line leaves room for goals, but still opposes the kind of open, end-to-end game needed to beat this selection. The market has landed in roughly 20% of the relevant sample, giving the selection a clearer statistical base.
Under 1.5 Goals
SC Paderborn 07 v VfL Wolfsburg
This under 1.5 pick is built around the expectation of a measured tempo and limited separation. The selection can still survive a competitive game, provided it does not turn into a wide-open scoring contest. The market has landed in roughly 80% of the relevant sample, giving the selection a clearer statistical base.
Shelbourne Double Chance (Win or Draw)
Derry City v Shelbourne
Shelbourne arrive with immense momentum following back-to-back league victories and an impressive five-match unbeaten streak. Joey O'Brien's side have proven incredibly tough to beat on the road, suffering only a single away defeat all season, making them highly reliable to avoid defeat against a stuttering host side.
Bohemians Double Chance (Win or Draw)
Bohemians v Shamrock Rovers
Bohemians have found excellent rhythm, scoring nine goals across three consecutive league wins. Conversely, league leaders Shamrock Rovers enter Phibsborough following back-to-back defeats. Given the hosts' soaring confidence and the depleted away attack missing senior options, backing Bohemians to avoid defeat offers significant statistical value.
Away Win
ST Mirren v Partick
Partick are preferred because the underlying matchup gives them the clearer route to victory. The selection is based on the stronger result expectation, not simply the bigger name in the fixture. The market has landed in roughly 37% of the relevant sample, giving the selection a clearer statistical base.
Chelsea Results
Manchester City Results
Chelsea
Manchester City
Availability / Injuries / Suspensions
Chelsea
Manchester City
Ryan Graydon over 0.5 fouls committed
Fouls Committed
Ryan Graydon's ultra-combative style makes him highly likely to commit at least one infraction at Wembley. Operating across wide positions and the frontline, the attacker racked up seventy-one fouls committed over the regular season while picking up ten yellow cards. He is deeply embedded in Salford’s high-press system, engaging in two hundred and sixty-five duels alongside eighty-five defensive contributions. Against a fluid Notts County midfield that relies heavily on quick combination passes, Graydon will consistently put his body on the line to break up transitions, ensuring the referee intervenes at least once during ninety minutes.
Ryan Graydon over 1.5 shots
Total Shots
Graydon acts as Salford’s primary direct attacking outlet, accumulating one hundred and one total shots across the league campaign—the second-highest tally in the division. He is a high-volume shooter who consistently searches for opening angles, firing eighty-seven of his attempts from inside the penalty area. Facing a fragile Notts County backline that allowed fifty-two regular-season goals and conceded a massive 1.45 Expected Goals in their semi-final second leg, Graydon will find plenty of opportunities to unleash attempts. His relentless nature ensures he will comfortably attempt at least two shots during the final.
Salford City over 3.5 corners
Total Corners
Salford’s direct offensive strategy relies extensively on utilising wide channels and executing rapid vertical counter-attacks to stretch opposing defensive blocks. This expansive approach generates high cross volumes, putting immense pressure on full-backs and forcing deflected clearances behind the goal-line. The frequency of Salford’s set-piece generation is mirrored by Graydon alone registering twenty-three shots from corner situations this season. Against a vulnerable Notts County defence that loses structural discipline during transition phases, the Ammies possess the necessary attacking momentum to force the ball out of play and secure at least four corner kicks easily.
Salford City draw no bet
Draw No Bet
Salford City retain a commanding psychological advantage over Notts County, having defeated them 2-1 in both regular-season league fixtures. Karl Robinson’s compact three-at-the-back alignment is custom-built to stifle the Magpies’ passing sequences before exposing their wide channels on the counter-attack. Notts County have a miserable record against elite opposition, conceding goals in nine out of ten games against top-six sides while registering just one clean sheet. Utilising the draw no bet market provides critical insurance in a high-stakes final, protecting the stake in a draw while backing the tactically superior team.
Over 2.5 total goals
Total Goals
Both teams possess high-octane attacking lines paired with volatile defensive units, creating the perfect recipe for a high-scoring final. Notts County conceded fifty-two regular-season goals, while Salford allowed fifty-five Expected Goals prior to the playoffs, demonstrating a shared inability to maintain defensive security. Furthermore, both regular-season encounters between these clubs finished with identical 2-1 scorelines, sailing over the target line. With individual talents like fifteen-goal Alassana Jatta and eleven-goal Ryan Graydon spearheading the respective attacks, this clash will easily open up to produce at least three total match goals.
Chelsea v Manchester City Match Centre: Odds, Markets & Bet Builder
Chelsea face Manchester City in FA Cup. This compact match summary brings together the key fixture context, available betting markets, player props, stats tabs and bet builder routes in one place.
Available market coverage currently includes Double chance, Goals, Draw no bet, Match odds and BTTS. Use the live Match Centre below to compare the current market view, inspect team data and build selections around the available betting angles.
