Football Stats Hub

Ried crestRied
v
Wolfsberger AC crestWolfsberger AC

Bundesliga | Tue 19 May, 17:30

Ried v Wolfsberger AC Stats

Data last updated: Thu 30 Jul 2026, 00:59 UK time

Match Report

Fixture analysis

Ried face Wolfsberger AC in Bundesliga on Tue 19 May, 17:30. Ried average 52.7% possession in their last 10 league games, while Wolfsberger average 51.6% — a tiny gap that underlines how evenly matched this tie really is. Wolfsberger arrive on a five-match unbeaten run, performing with clinical accuracy during transitions.

BT4Y lean · price warning

Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner

  • Price warning: current odds imply about 58%, above the 47% model chance, so this is a football-led pick rather than a clear value bet; reduce stake or wait for a better price.
  • At 8/11, Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner implies roughly 58%, while BT4Y rates the chance closer to 47%.
  • The Both Teams to Score market requires each team to find the net at least once during normal time.
  • Ried show a 20% BTTS rate and Wolfsberger AC show a 20% BTTS rate, which is the right starting point for this market.
  • Ried average 0.8 goals scored and Wolfsberger AC average 1.6, so both attacking contributions need separating.
Price warning

Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner is still the main football pick, but the current price is short: the market implies about 58% while the model sits nearer 47% (-11.2 pts). Keep staking reduced or wait for a better price unless final team news strengthens the selection. Better value alternative: Wolfsberger AC Draw No Bet shows a +15 pts edge at 2.1.

Why This Pick Is Price-Sensitive

Football case vs market price

The 47% for Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner sits against roughly 58% implied by the current price. Ried show a 20% BTTS rate and Wolfsberger AC show a 20% BTTS rate, which is the right starting point for this market. The Both Teams to Score market requires each team to find the net at least once during normal time.

Model chance vs price47% model chance against roughly 58% implied
Negative
Ried show a 20% BTTS rate and Wolfsberger AC show.Visible data support
Positive
Ried average 0.8 goals scored and Wolfsberger AC average 1.6.Visible data support
Positive
The Both Teams to Score market requires each team.Article support
Positive

Verdict

BT4Y analyst view

BT4Y analyst view: Both Teams To Score is the preferred angle because the Both Teams to Score market requires each team to find the net at least once during normal time. Ried show a that shared-scoring rate rate and Wolfsberger AC show a 20% BTTS rate, which is the right starting point for this market. WAC still use wing-backs and a three-man defensive line, but their intention is different.

Main risk

WAC still use wing-backs and a three-man defensive line, but their intention is different.

Key Data Signals

Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner evidence

The Both Teams to Score market requires each team to find the net at least once during normal.

Ried show a 20% BTTS rate and Wolfsberger AC show a 20% BTTS rate, which is the right starting point for this market.

Ried average 0.8 goals scored and Wolfsberger AC average 1.6, so both attacking contributions need separating.

What To Watch In The Data

Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner notes

  • Use shots on target to decide whether attacking involvement is shared or one-sided.
Goals, BTTS and over/under

Scoring profile, tempo and goal-market analysis.

Ried0.8
Avg goals scored
Wolfsberger AC1.6
Ried1
Avg goals conceded
Wolfsberger AC0.8
Ried20%
BTTS rate
Wolfsberger AC20%
Ried20%
Over 2.5 goals
Wolfsberger AC40%
Market aligned with main pickBTTS YesBetfred guide price · Model 47% vs implied 58% · edge -11.1 pts
1.73
Check odds @ 1.73
Load more odds for this section
Under 2.5 GoalsBetMGM guide price · model 66%
1.85
Check odds @ 1.85
BTTS NoBetMGM guide price · model 57%
2
Check odds @ 2
Over 3.5 GoalsBet365 guide price · model 22%
3.4
Check odds @ 3.4
Over 2.5 GoalsBetMGM guide price · model 35%
1.95
Check odds @ 1.95
Over 1.5 GoalsBetMGM guide price · model 53%
1.28
Check odds @ 1.28
BTTS Yes does not fully support the current price: the BTTS rates are 20% for Ried and 20% for Wolfsberger AC, so the price depends on both attacks contributing rather than the clean-sheet story.
Market odds

Top available prices first, with more markets available on demand.

Market aligned with main pickBTTS YesBetfred guide price · Model 47% vs implied 58% · edge -11.1 pts
1.73
Check odds @ 1.73
Load more odds for this section
Wolfsberger AC Draw No BetBetMGM guide price · model 63%
2.1
Check odds @ 2.1
Wolfsberger AC to WinBet365 guide price · model 46%
3.2
Check odds @ 3.2
Ried Draw No BetBetfred guide price · model 45%
1.7
Check odds @ 1.7
DrawBetMGM guide price · model 20%
3.3
Check odds @ 3.3
Over 2.5 GoalsBetMGM guide price · model 35%
1.95
Check odds @ 1.95
Ried to WinBet365 guide price · model 27%
2.25
Check odds @ 2.25
BTTS Yes is price-sensitive at the current guide price, but the price only matters if the football route is clear. Use the model-versus-implied gap as the starting point, then check whether the article context, team news and section data actually point towards the same market.
Corners, cards and shots

Territory, discipline and chance-volume data.

Ried5.25
Avg corners for
Wolfsberger AC4.2
Ried10.75
Avg total corners
Wolfsberger AC10.4
Ried2.75
Avg yellow cards
Wolfsberger AC1.8
Ried10.25
Avg shots
Wolfsberger AC10.6
Best odds for this sectionOver 9.5 CornersBet365 guide price · Model 65% vs implied 50% · edge +14.8 pts
2
Check odds @ 2
Over 9.5 Corners needs a clear match pattern behind it. For corners, that means territory, wide deliveries and blocked shots; for cards, it means duels and transition fouls; for shots, it means repeat box entries rather than harmless possession.
Recent form

Results, scoring balance and short-term direction.

Ried

LLWLW
Last 52W 0D 3L
Last 5 record
Last 104W 2D 4L
16 May 2026A SCR Altach0-2
09 May 2026H Wolfsberger AC0-1
02 May 2026H FC BW Linz2-0
25 Apr 2026A WSG Wattens0-1
21 Apr 2026H Grazer AK2-1

Wolfsberger AC

WWWWL
Last 54W 0D 1L
Last 5 record
Last 104W 3D 3L
16 May 2026H WSG Wattens2-0
09 May 2026A Ried1-0
04 May 2026A SCR Altach4-1
25 Apr 2026H Grazer AK1-0
21 Apr 2026A FC BW Linz0-3
Best odds for this sectionAway / DrawBetMGM guide price · Model 77% vs implied 62% · edge +15 pts
1.62
Check odds @ 1.62
Load more odds for this section
Wolfsberger AC Draw No BetBetMGM guide price · model 63%
2.1
Check odds @ 2.1
Wolfsberger AC to WinBet365 guide price · model 46%
3.2
Check odds @ 3.2
Ried Draw No BetBetfred guide price · model 45%
1.7
Check odds @ 1.7
DrawBetMGM guide price · model 20%
3.3
Check odds @ 3.3
Ried to WinBet365 guide price · model 27%
2.25
Check odds @ 2.25
Home / DrawBetfred guide price · model 48%
1.28
Check odds @ 1.28
Head-to-head

Recent meetings and how much they still matter.

3Ried wins
2Draws
5Wolfsberger AC wins
09 May 2026Ried v Wolfsberger AC0-1
11 Apr 2026Wolfsberger AC v Ried0-0
29 Nov 2025Ried v Wolfsberger AC1-0
18 Oct 2025Wolfsberger AC v Ried1-2
26 Sep 2023Ried v Wolfsberger AC1-2
02 Jun 2023Ried v Wolfsberger AC1-2
Market aligned with main pickBTTS YesBetfred guide price · Model 47% vs implied 58% · edge -11.1 pts
1.73
Check odds @ 1.73
Load more odds for this section
Wolfsberger AC to WinBet365 guide price · model 46%
3.2
Check odds @ 3.2
DrawBetMGM guide price · model 20%
3.3
Check odds @ 3.3
Over 2.5 GoalsBetMGM guide price · model 35%
1.95
Check odds @ 1.95
Ried to WinBet365 guide price · model 27%
2.25
Check odds @ 2.25
The head-to-head sample gives context for BTTS Yes, but it should not overrule the current tactical picture. If previous meetings show goals or momentum swings, they support the market only when the present form and line-ups point to the same game state.
Player stats

Player-level trends, roles and attacking routes.

Player stats are loading separately so the stats page stays fast.

Open Match Centre player odds

Season team stats

Bundesliga

Ried35
Played
Wolfsberger AC33
Ried1.2
Avg goals for
Wolfsberger AC1.3
Ried1.3
Avg goals against
Wolfsberger AC1.3
Ried7
Clean sheets
Wolfsberger AC9
Best odds for this sectionWolfsberger AC Draw No BetBetMGM guide price · Model 63% vs implied 48% · edge +15 pts
2.1
Check odds @ 2.1
Load more odds for this section
Wolfsberger AC to WinBet365 guide price · model 46%
3.2
Check odds @ 3.2
Ried Draw No BetBetfred guide price · model 45%
1.7
Check odds @ 1.7
Ried to WinBet365 guide price · model 27%
2.25
Check odds @ 2.25
Season data supports Wolfsberger AC Draw No Bet when the attacking output and defensive control both point towards the same outcome. The useful read is whether those longer-term numbers create a believable route to chances, pressure and game control in this specific match.
League standings snapshot

Current table context.

PosTeamPtsPWDLGD
9Ried28228410-4
10Wolfsberger AC26227510-1
7Ried283212614-4
8Wolfsberger AC283211813-1
Ried sit in position 7, while Wolfsberger AC sit in position 8, so table pressure belongs in the Wins as soon as both teams score, offering a balanced approach that eliminates the volatility of picking a specific match winner assessment.
Key match trends

Goal-pattern analysis from recent form and H2H samples.

20%Ried Over 2.5
40%Wolfsberger AC Over 2.5
1.8H2H avg goals
The Over 2.5 trend is mixed: Ried sit at 20% and Wolfsberger AC sit at 40% with the H2H average at 1.8 goals, so the goals line needs more than one team's recent over rate.

Next step

Betting context

Start with the clearest numbers above, then check live odds, team news and the full prediction before staking.