Football Stats Hub

China crestChina
v
Palestine crestPalestine

Friendlies | Fri 02 Oct, 12:35

China v Palestine Stats

Data last updated: Thu 01 Oct 2026, 09:15 UK time

Match Report

Fixture analysis

China faces Palestine in a friendly match where both teams have shown moderate scoring and defensive records recently. China averages 1.4 goals scored and 1.2 conceded per game, while Palestine has slightly higher scoring at 1.6 goals but concedes similarly at 1.2. Both sides have mixed recent form with China earning 8 points and Palestine 7 in their last matches. The tactical setup and cautious approach typical of friendlies suggest a controlled game with limited goal-scoring chances, making a low-scoring match plausible.

BT4Y best bet

BTTS No

  • China concedes an average of 1.2 goals per game, indicating defensive solidity.
  • Palestine's matches see Both Teams To Score 60% of the time, but China only 40%, suggesting a lower BTTS likelihood.
  • China averages nearly 10 corners per game, showing attacking pressure but not necessarily goals.
  • Recent form shows China and Palestine have similar defensive records, supporting a cautious game.
  • Historical head-to-head matches average 2 goals, indicating moderate scoring potential.

Why The Model Likes This Bet

Chance, price and football numbers

The model favors BTTS No with a 47.3% chance, higher than the implied market chance of 38.2%, indicating value in expecting a clean sheet or a shutout. Both teams have moderate goal-scoring but also concede at similar rates, and recent form data shows China has a lower BTTS rate (40%) compared to Palestine (60%). The match context of a friendly often leads to conservative tactics, reducing goal-scoring opportunities. This combination supports the likelihood of one team failing to score, making BTTS No a sensible selection.

Model Chance vs Market47.3% model chance vs 38.2% implied (+9.1 pts)
Strong positive
China BTTS Rate40%
Positive
Palestine BTTS Rate60%
Neutral
Recent Defensive FormBoth concede ~1.2 goals per game
Positive
Match TypeFriendly, likely cautious play
Positive
Main risk

Clean-sheet strength on one side can quickly weaken the shared-scoring case.

Quote from Expert

BT4Y analyst view · BTTS No rationale

“This fixture’s friendly status and balanced defensive records point to a match where one side may fail to score, making BTTS No a compelling angle despite Palestine’s occasional attacking bursts.”

Key Data Signals

BTTS No evidence

China concedes an average of 1.2 goals per game, indicating defensive solidity.

China averages nearly 10 corners per game, showing attacking pressure but not necessarily goals.

Recent form shows China and Palestine have similar defensive records, supporting a cautious game.

What To Watch In The Data

BTTS No notes

  • In the last two head-to-head matches, the average goals scored were 2, indicating moderate scoring levels.
  • China’s 80% Over 2.5 goals rate contrasts with Palestine’s 60%, but the low BTTS rate for China suggests goals may come from one side only.
  • The trend points to a match with goal opportunities but a reasonable chance that both teams will not score.
Goals, BTTS and over/under

Scoring profile, tempo and goal-market analysis.

China1.4
Avg goals scored
Palestine1.6
China1.2
Avg goals conceded
Palestine1.2
China40%
BTTS rate
Palestine60%
China80%
Over 2.5 goals
Palestine60%
Market aligned with main pickBTTS NoBetMGM guide price · Model 47% vs implied 38% · edge +9.1 pts
2.62
Check odds @ 2.62
Load more odds for this section
Over 1.5 GoalsBet365 guide price · model 80%
1.12
Check odds @ 1.12
Under 2.5 GoalsBetMGM guide price · model 42%
2.7
Check odds @ 2.7
Over 2.5 GoalsBet365 guide price · model 62%
1.44
Check odds @ 1.44
Over 3.5 GoalsBetfred guide price · model 44%
2.1
Check odds @ 2.1
BTTS YesBet365 guide price · model 57%
1.44
Check odds @ 1.44
Recent form shows China’s matches have a 40% BTTS rate, lower than Palestine’s 60%, reflecting China’s more conservative defensive approach. Both teams concede around 1.2 goals per game, and their two previous meetings averaged 2 goals, supporting a moderate scoring environment with a reasonable chance that both teams will not score.
Market odds

Top available prices first, with more markets available on demand.

Best odds for this sectionChina Draw No BetBet365 guide price · Model 56% vs implied 58% · edge -2.2 pts
1.72
Check odds @ 1.72
Load more odds for this section
Palestine Draw No BetBet365 guide price · model 49%
2.08
Check odds @ 2.08
Over 2.5 GoalsBet365 guide price · model 62%
1.44
Check odds @ 1.44
DrawBet365 guide price · model 29%
4
Check odds @ 4
China to WinBetMGM guide price · model 46%
2.1
Check odds @ 2.1
Palestine to WinBet365 guide price · model 38%
2.6
Check odds @ 2.6
BTTS YesBet365 guide price · model 57%
1.44
Check odds @ 1.44
The 47.3% for BTTS No sits against roughly 38.2% implied by the current price (+9.1 pts). China show a 40% BTTS rate and Palestine show a 60% BTTS rate, which is the right starting point for this market.
Recent form

Results, scoring balance and short-term direction.

China

LWDWD
Last 52W 2D 1L
Last 5 record
Last 102W 2D 1L
27 Sep 2026H New Zealand0-3
24 Sep 2026H Maldives3-0
09 Jun 2026H Thailand0-0
05 Jun 2026A Singapore2-1
26 Jan 2026A Uzbekistan2-2

Palestine

DWDDD
Last 51W 4D 0L
Last 5 record
Last 101W 4D 0L
30 Sep 2026A Konyaspor2-2
28 Sep 2026A Tajikistan4-2
24 Sep 2026H New Zealand2-2
09 Jun 2026A Kyrgyzstan0-0
06 Jun 2026A Kyrgyzstan0-0
Best odds for this sectionHome / DrawBet365 guide price · Model 75% vs implied 69% · edge +5.5 pts
1.44
Check odds @ 1.44
Load more odds for this section
Away / DrawBetfred guide price · model 68%
1.62
Check odds @ 1.62
China Draw No BetBet365 guide price · model 56%
1.72
Check odds @ 1.72
Palestine Draw No BetBet365 guide price · model 49%
2.08
Check odds @ 2.08
DrawBet365 guide price · model 29%
4
Check odds @ 4
China to WinBetMGM guide price · model 46%
2.1
Check odds @ 2.1
Palestine to WinBet365 guide price · model 38%
2.6
Check odds @ 2.6
China has accumulated 8 points recently with a goal scoring average of 1.4 and conceding 1.2 per game, showing stable form. Palestine’s 7 points and 1.6 goals scored per game reflect a slightly more attacking approach but similar defensive vulnerability. The disparity in BTTS rates (China 40%, Palestine 60%) suggests China’s recent matches are less likely to see both teams scoring, reinforcing the BTTS No angle.
Key match trends

Goal-pattern analysis from recent form and H2H samples.

80%China Over 2.5
60%Palestine Over 2.5
2H2H avg goals
In the last two head-to-head matches, the average goals scored were 2, indicating moderate scoring levels. China’s 80% Over 2.5 goals rate contrasts with Palestine’s 60%, but the low BTTS rate for China suggests goals may come from one side only. The trend points to a match with goal opportunities but a reasonable chance that both teams will not score.

Loading deeper match data…