bet365
BetMGM
William Hill
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
Can Chelsea halt Aston Villa’s streak and close the gap on third in the Stamford Bridge tea-time clash?
Stamford Bridge gets the Saturday tea-time treatment, and it’s the kind of fixture that comes with its own weather system: noise, nerves, and a league table subplot loud enough to drown out the Christmas playlists still clinging to the concourses. Read on for complete analysis and the best betting tips.
To use the Live Streaming service you will need to be logged in and have a funded account or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. Geo location and live streaming rules apply.
Global Video Listings for this match
Works worldwide • Email + on-site access • Instant unlock
▾
Chelsea boast superior underlying metrics, creating more chances (1.73 xG at home) and conceding fewer quality opportunities (1.16 xGA) than Villa. With Cole Palmer fit for 90 minutes and Villa missing defenders like Pau Torres, the hosts are primed to end Villa's streak.
▾
History suggests goals (3.15 avg per game), and Villa’s 1.44 xGA suggests they will concede. However, Villa’s clinical transition play should see them score, making a narrow home win the most consistent outcome with the data.
▾
Readers’ Tip
Vote your pick — quick & anonymous
Terms & Conditions (tap to view)
Chelsea vs Aston Villa Predictions and Best Bets
Chelsea vs Aston Villa — bet365 Market Snapshot
Swipe through key markets with illustrative probabilities and sample bet365 odds based on our match analysis.
Despite Villa’s winning run, home advantage and superior underlying data see Chelsea priced as favourites.
Prices point towards a competitive but scoring affair, with the 1-1 draw and 2-1 Chelsea win seen as plausible outcomes.
Markets lean heavily towards goals, with Over 2.5 and BTTS both priced as odds-on favourites.
Cole Palmer is the standout threat for Chelsea, heavily favoured to score or assist, with Joao Pedro also short odds to find the net.
- Seven-point gap, same number of games: Aston Villa are third on 36 points after 17 matches, while Chelsea are fourth on 29, making this a direct chance to squeeze the margin.
- Streak meets stake: Aston Villa bring a 10-match winning streak across all competitions, and they could end the day joint-top, adding extra bite to every phase of the contest.
- Goals spread, but one stands out: Morgan Rogers has seven league goals to lead Villa’s scorers, while Chelsea’s top scorers Pedro Neto and João Pedro have five each, shaping where the biggest threats may come from.
Check out our Chelsea betting hub for the latest deep-dive stats, trends, and expert predictions for the 2025/26 season.
Attacking Threat: Expected Goals (xG)
Chelsea are generating higher quality chances than their opponents, particularly at home, suggesting their attack is more sustainable.
This rises to 1.73 at home, showing Stamford Bridge is where they create their best openings.
Villa create less on average, but their slightly higher conversion rate (14% vs 12%) keeps them dangerous.
Defensive Stability: Expected Goals Against
The underlying numbers suggest Villa’s defence is conceding more chances than Chelsea’s, despite their league position.
Chelsea are limiting opponents to fewer high-quality chances, providing a solid platform for results.
Villa give up more opportunities, which could be punished by Chelsea’s returning attacking talent.
Fixture History: Goal Average
Matches between these two sides rarely lack entertainment, with a strong trend of high-scoring affairs.
Both teams have scored in 53% of these past encounters, reinforcing the expectation of goals.
Chelsea host Aston Villa in the Premier League with the headline simple and sharp. Unai Emery’s side arrive aiming to stretch a 10-match winning streak across all competitions, while Chelsea are trying to put a proper foot down in a race that’s tightened into a four-lane scrap. Villa sit third, Chelsea fourth, and the gap between them is already seven points. For Chelsea, that’s not just a number; it’s a feeling. It’s the difference between chasing and setting the pace. Lose this and you’re not just handing Villa another big night — you’re inviting the rest of the top-four challengers to start leaning on your shoulder.
Villa’s own stakes are just as juicy. They could end the day joint-top of the table. That doesn’t happen by accident. It happens because you walk into games like this with a clear idea of who you are, and how you’re going to play even when the stadium is trying to talk you out of it.
Chelsea, though, aren’t exactly short of motivation. Enzo Maresca has spoken with the kind of clarity you want from a manager before a big game: Cole Palmer is progressing, Reece James is building minutes and leadership, and two sidelined summer signings are back in the mix. That’s a lot of moving parts for a match that’s already hot on context.
And that’s why this feels like a pivot point rather than “just” a big game. Villa come to West London with confidence and organisation. Chelsea come with a squad Maresca says he’s “in love” with, a captain building momentum, and a home crowd that will demand intent from the first whistle.
Tea-time games can drift into cagey, careful affairs. This one shouldn’t. Not with Villa’s streak on the line, not with Chelsea’s position under pressure, and not with both sides leaning into the same basic truth: this is a Champions League-place scrap dressed up as a festive blockbuster.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Chelsea’s possible starting XI is given as: Sanchez; James, Fofana, Chalobah, Cucurella; Fernandez, Caicedo; Neto, Palmer, Garnacho; Joao Pedro.
That reads like a 4-2-3-1 with familiar pillars. Reece James as captain on the right, Marc Cucurella on the left, and a midfield base of Enzo Fernandez and Moisés Caicedo that can either stabilise the game or crank it into something more aggressive. Ahead of them, Pedro Neto and Alejandro Garnacho bring running power either side of Palmer, with Joao Pedro up top.
William Hill
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
BetMGM
Bet £10 Get £40 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
bet365
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Betfred
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
10bet
100% Up To £50 On First Deposit
Show Terms & Conditions
Maresca’s press conference lines give the clearest Chelsea update: Estevao Willian and Liam Delap are fit and available. He was happy about both being back, and he made it plain there wasn’t a neat, fixed timeline for Delap’s absence — the point now is simply that he’s available.
The other big Chelsea note is Palmer. Maresca believes Palmer is ready to play 90 minutes, describing the progression through minutes and referencing that Palmer played one hour against Everton and more than 70 against Newcastle. If Palmer is a central part of Chelsea’s attacking rhythm — and Maresca talks about him like he is — then “ready for 90” matters. It shapes how Chelsea can build their attack over the whole evening, not just in bursts.
Maresca also spoke warmly about Reece James: growing leadership, playing more minutes, being fit and healthy, and being “one of the main players” — with the extra weight of “academy player” and “captain” attached. That doesn’t just tell you James might start; it tells you what Maresca wants Chelsea to look like: organised, assertive, and led from the back.
On the Villa side, the possible XI is listed as: Martinez; Cash, Konsa, Lindelof, Maatsen; Kamara, Onana; McGinn, Tielemans, Rogers; Watkins.
That’s another 4-2-3-1 shape on paper, and it’s hard not to smile at the symmetry: two teams with similar base structures, both built to be organised without the ball and flexible with it. With Boubacar Kamara and Amadou Onana as the midfield base, Villa can screen and tackle, then release quickly. John McGinn and Youri Tielemans offer clever angles and timing, Morgan Rogers offers direct threat, and Ollie Watkins gives them a forward who can lead transitions and finish moves.
Villa’s team news in the material is more mixed. Ross Barkley is out until February, while Pau Torres and Tyrone Mings are sidelined with calf and hamstring issues respectively. There’s also mention that Jadon Sancho could return after being ineligible to face Manchester United, and that Harvey Elliott could return after being ruled out of the United victory with illness.
So Villa arrive with a defined attacking core, and with defensive options shaped by those absences. Chelsea arrive with two attackers back available and a manager who sounds confident about the fitness trajectory of his key No10 and his captain.
Even before you talk tactics, that’s the balance of the match: Villa’s confidence and continuity versus Chelsea’s sense of getting pieces back into place.
How the Match Could Be Played
A clash of 4-2-3-1 systems. Chelsea look to dominate the central channel, using Palmer to orchestrate play while Neto and Garnacho stretch the pitch wide. Villa stay compact and organised, ready to absorb pressure and launch rapid transitions through Rogers and Watkins into the space left by Chelsea’s advanced full-backs.
Because both teams have a 4-2-3-1 shape attached to them, the first tactical battle is obvious: the No10 spaces and the two pivot zones. Whoever owns the central lanes doesn’t just control the ball — they control the story.
Chelsea’s likely attacking structure points you toward two main routes. One is width: Pedro Neto and Garnacho driving at full-backs, forcing Villa’s back line to shift and scramble. The other is central combinations: Palmer receiving between Villa’s midfield and defence, then finding Joao Pedro or slipping runners through. Maresca has been clear that he “loves” Palmer and calls him “my player”, and he’s also made the point that Palmer’s fitness is building to 90 minutes. That matters tactically because it changes the rhythm of Chelsea’s threat: they can keep returning to the same problem again and again, rather than hoping their best phases happen while their best creator is still fresh.
Chelsea’s profile also includes a stated style: short passes, possession football, through balls often, rotating their first eleven, and attacking through the middle — while still being strong attacking down the wings. Put that together and you can picture the intended pattern. Chelsea want to work Villa side-to-side until a lane opens, then punch through it. Neto can run at you; Palmer can pick a pass; Joao Pedro can act as a finisher or a connector. If Villa sit compact, Chelsea can try to stretch them. If Villa jump to press, Chelsea can look to play through quickly.
The obvious counterpoint is that Villa are described as organised both on and off the ball, with a clear way of playing. Maresca said as much himself, and it matches the wider picture: Villa come in full of confidence, and their strengths include attacking down the wings, creating chances using through balls, individual skill, and long shot opportunities. They also have a noted strength in coming back from losing positions and protecting the lead. That doesn’t mean they’ll be reckless or passive. It means they’re comfortable in different game states — and a game like this tends to swing between them.
So where might Villa hurt Chelsea? Start with the midfield base. Kamara and Onana offer a blend of positional discipline and physical presence. If Chelsea try to funnel everything through Palmer, Villa can compress the middle and make Palmer play under contact. That can force Chelsea wide, and if Chelsea go wide too early or too predictably, Villa can trap and counter.
That’s where Rogers becomes central. He’s not just “in form” in the narrative around this match; he’s also specifically mentioned as scoring two goals against Manchester United in Villa’s last match. The detail matters because it tells you Villa’s threat isn’t theoretical. If Chelsea lose structure during an attack — one extra player committed, one full-back too high, one midfield pass forced into traffic — Villa have the kind of runners who can turn one turnover into a shot.
Watkins is another key. In this kind of match, a forward’s first job might not be shooting; it might be giving your team an exit. If Chelsea squeeze Villa back, Watkins can become the release valve: a channel run, a hold-up moment, a lay-off into the path of Rogers or Tielemans. The presence of McGinn adds bite to those phases too, because he can arrive to contest second balls and keep attacks alive.
For Chelsea defensively, the key is their own midfield pair. Caicedo and Fernandez will be asked to do two jobs at once: protect the back line and also move Chelsea forward with control. If they can keep Villa’s counter-attack lanes narrow and under control, Chelsea can keep the game in Villa’s half for longer spells. If they get dragged into chasing, Chelsea’s shape can stretch — and Villa are described as a side that likes through balls and individual skill, exactly the kind of tools that punish stretched teams.
The full-back battles also look decisive. Reece James, by Maresca’s own telling, is building into minutes and leadership and is “one of our main players”. If James is stepping into midfield in possession or pushing on to deliver from wide, he can become a genuine extra man in Chelsea’s build-up. But every extra man you commit forward comes with a receipt. Villa have Cash on one side and Maatsen on the other in the listed XI, plus wide threats in Rogers and potentially the angles created by McGinn and Tielemans drifting. If Chelsea’s full-backs go, Villa will look to go into the space they leave.
Then there’s the chess match around pressing. Chelsea’s recent match at Newcastle is framed as a game where they weren’t good in the first half but improved and showed fight to earn a 2-2 draw. That suggests a team capable of shifting intensity within a match — and in this fixture, intensity is tactical. Press high and you might pin Villa back, win the ball close to goal, and give Palmer and Joao Pedro short distances to hurt them. Press badly and you give Villa exactly what they’re set up to use: through-ball chances and direct breaks.
Villa’s own approach will likely be shaped by confidence. A team on a 10-match winning streak doesn’t arrive hoping to survive. They arrive with belief that their plan works. That could mean periods of calm possession, but it could also mean targeted aggression: press Chelsea’s first pass, force Sanchez into hurried decisions, and then attack quickly when the ball turns over.
So, tactically, the match has a clear tension. Chelsea want to control the central spaces and combine, using their wide players as weapons rather than as escape routes. Villa want to stay organised, absorb or press in the right moments, then strike into space with runners and quick passing.
And with both teams using a similar base shape, it often comes down to which No10 and which double pivot can impose their personality on the game.
The Numbers That Support the Story
Start with the table because it frames the psychology. After 17 matches, Aston Villa are third with 36 points, and Chelsea are fourth with 29 points. That seven-point gap isn’t just a margin; it’s a chunk of season. Villa have scored 27 and conceded 18. Chelsea have scored 29 and conceded 17. So despite the points gap, the goal figures are close enough to underline how fine the margins can be when two top-four sides collide — it’s not a mismatch on goals, it’s a difference in how consistently each side has turned performances into results.
Chelsea’s broader league record is listed as 8 wins, 5 draws and 4 defeats from 17, while Villa have 11 wins, 3 draws and 3 defeats. That extra edge in wins is the difference between being the pursuer and being the one setting the questions.
The team profiles deepen the tactical read. Chelsea average 58% possession, Villa 52%, which fits the idea of Chelsea wanting to dominate territory and rhythm while Villa are comfortable being slightly more flexible about where and how they attack. Chelsea average 14.06 shots per match, Villa 11.59. That suggests Chelsea can build volume — but volume only matters if it becomes quality, and this is where conversion and chance creation come into it.
Chelsea’s shot conversion rate is listed as 12%, and Villa’s as 14%. That gap is small, but it hints at a difference in ruthlessness: Villa don’t necessarily need a huge number of shots to score. In a match where Chelsea could have more of the ball and more attempts, Villa’s ability to turn fewer moments into goals becomes a very real threat.
Expected goals adds another layer. Chelsea’s xG for is listed as 1.63 per match (with 1.73 at home), while Villa’s xG for is 1.34 per match (with 1.27 away). That supports the sense that Chelsea can generate strong chance value at Stamford Bridge. But it also shows Villa’s away xG isn’t negligible — it’s enough to be a danger if Chelsea’s structure slips.
Defensively, Chelsea’s xG against is 1.16 per match, Villa’s 1.44 per match. In practical terms, that suggests Chelsea may be more consistent at limiting the quality of chances they allow, while Villa can sometimes give up opportunities — which is why Chelsea’s creativity, especially through Palmer, becomes central to whether the game tilts.
Head-to-head history is heavy with numbers too, and it’s worth being precise because the material includes more than one summary. One h2h line gives totals of Chelsea wins: 70, Aston Villa wins: 61, draws: 37. Another section states that in 34 meetings, Chelsea have won 18, Villa 9, with 7 draws, and that Chelsea scored 70 goals while Villa scored 37 in those matches. Whichever cut you look at, the pattern points to a rivalry that has produced a lot of meetings and a lot of goals, and that’s before you even factor in that previous match-ups are said to have averaged 3.15 goals, with both teams scoring happening 53% of the time in those meetings.
There’s also a recent reference point: the “fixture analysis” notes that the last meeting ended Chelsea 2-0 Aston Villa. Again, it doesn’t write Saturday’s script, but it does show that Chelsea have recently found a way to keep Villa out in this match-up — which matters when Villa come in with confidence and a streak.
Individually, the goal numbers sharpen the attacking narrative. For Chelsea’s top scorers in the league season listed, Pedro Neto and João Pedro both have 5, with Enzo Fernández on 4, Trevoh Chalobah on 3, and Moisés Caicedo on 3. Villa’s list is led by Morgan Rogers on 7, with Emi Buendía and Donyell Malen on 4, and Matty Cash and Ollie Watkins on 3. So both sides spread goals around, but Villa have one player ahead of the pack — and he’s the one specifically mentioned as scoring two against Manchester United last time out.
In other words: this match isn’t just about systems. It’s about whether Chelsea can turn their home chance level into goals, and whether Villa can keep finding decisive contributions from a group that’s already delivering across the season.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first big “moment” might be less a single incident and more a pattern: what happens when Palmer gets his first clean touch between the lines. If Villa allow him to receive on the turn, Chelsea’s whole front four starts to hum — Neto and Garnacho can run beyond, Joao Pedro can threaten the box, and suddenly Villa’s midfield is chasing rather than shaping. If Villa can crowd Palmer early and force him backwards, they can push Chelsea’s attacks into wider areas where the match becomes more about duels than about combinations.
Another pivotal moment is how Villa handle Chelsea’s wide threat. Chelsea are described as strong attacking down the wings, and they’ve got Neto and Garnacho listed either side. Villa’s full-backs in the possible XI — Cash and Maatsen — will be under pressure not just to defend, but to decide when they can step and when they must hold. Get that wrong once and you’re either allowing a cross, or opening a lane inside.
For Villa, the swing factor is transition speed. Rogers, Watkins, and the midfield runners behind them can turn a turnover into a chance quickly. Chelsea’s vulnerability, tactically, would come if they commit numbers forward and lose the ball in central areas — because Villa’s stated strengths include through balls and individual skill, exactly the tools you use to attack a disorganised opponent. If Villa can win the ball with Kamara or Onana and immediately find Tielemans or Rogers in space, you can picture Stamford Bridge going from “attack” to “alarm” in two passes.
Set-piece themes hover too. Chelsea are described as strong shooting from direct free kicks and strong at attacking set pieces. Villa, meanwhile, are listed as weak defending set pieces and weak at avoiding fouling in dangerous areas. That combination doesn’t guarantee anything, but it does shape the danger zones: if Chelsea can force Villa into cheap fouls around the box, it brings a different kind of pressure — and it’s pressure that doesn’t require long spells of possession.
There’s also the game-state narrative. Villa are described as very strong at coming back from losing positions and strong at protecting the lead. That matters because it suggests resilience either way: if Chelsea start fast and score, Villa have shown an ability to respond; if Villa get ahead, they have a track record of managing games. Chelsea’s own recent match at Newcastle is framed as a fightback that earned a point in a 2-2 draw, and Maresca referenced the idea of continuing to grow. That points to a Chelsea side that can find something when the game turns against them — but also hints at the need to start cleaner than they did at St James’ Park.
What could go wrong with this read? The neatest tactical previews can be undone by the messiest parts of football. A single early goal can flip the balance of risk and patience. A key player can have an off night even when fit. A team can be organised and still concede to one moment of sharp execution. And with both sides built around a similar shape, the match can hinge on tiny details: one misjudged step in the press, one loose pass in midfield, one overhit through ball that turns into a counter the other way. Fine margins don’t always announce themselves. They just show up on the scoreboard.
Best Bet for Chelsea vs Aston Villa
Works worldwide • Email + on-site access • Instant unlock
Chelsea to Win
While Aston Villa arrive at Stamford Bridge protecting an impressive 10-match winning streak across all competitions, the underlying performance metrics and squad trajectories suggest Chelsea are well-positioned to end that run. The deciding factor lies in the quality of chances created and defensive solidity. Chelsea possess a superior expected goals (xG) output of 1.63 per match (rising to 1.73 at home) compared to Villa’s 1.34 per match. Crucially, Chelsea’s defense has been tighter, conceding an average of 1.16 xG against, whereas Villa’s xG against stands at 1.44. This indicates that Villa’s recent results may be masking a defensive vulnerability that Chelsea’s potent attack can exploit.
The personnel situation further tilts the balance toward the hosts. Enzo Maresca confirmed that Cole Palmer is ready to play 90 minutes, ensuring Chelsea can sustain their attacking rhythm for the entire match rather than in bursts. With Pedro Neto and João Pedro (five league goals each) stretching the play, Chelsea have the tools to hurt a Villa backline missing key figures like Pau Torres and Tyrone Mings. Conversely, Villa’s reliance on transition moments through Morgan Rogers and Ollie Watkins faces a Chelsea side that recently kept a clean sheet in a 2-0 victory over this opponent.
Chelsea’s possession-dominant style (58% average) combined with the return of Reece James adds leadership and stability to their build-up. In a fixture where margins are described as fine, the combination of home advantage, key players returning to full fitness, and superior underlying data makes Chelsea the logical selection to take all three points and close the gap in the top-four race.
What could go wrong Aston Villa’s resilience is a significant threat; they are noted for their ability to recover from losing positions and manage leads effectively. If Chelsea’s midfield pair of Enzo Fernandez and Moisés Caicedo fail to track the runs of Morgan Rogers—who enters in form with two goals in his last match—Villa’s ruthlessness in transition could punish the Blues.
Correct score lean Chelsea 2-1 Aston Villa A home victory is supported by Chelsea’s superior xG production (1.73 at home), but a clean sheet may be difficult to secure against a Villa side that has scored 27 goals this season. Historical meetings between these two have averaged 3.15 goals per game, suggesting a high-scoring affair. With Villa missing key defenders but retaining a dangerous attack led by Watkins and Rogers, Chelsea scoring twice to edge a tight contest aligns with the statistical profiles of both teams.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
| |
New cust. Deposit £10+ in 7 days & bet on sports. Min odds apply. Reward = 4 x £10 Free Bets (2 x £10 Bet Builders & 2 x £10 Sports bet). Valid 7 days. Free bets not valid on e-sports & non UK/IE horse racing. 18+. T&Cs apply. | |
| |
Open Account Offer - New Customers only. Bet £10 and get £30 in Free Bets when you join bet365. Sign up, deposit between £5 and £10 to your account and bet365 will give you three times that value in Free Bets when you place qualifying bets to the same value settle. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits. Min odds/bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. T&Cs , time limits & exclusions apply. Registration Required. #Ad. 18+ Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+. Play Safe. From 00:01 on 18.10.2022. £30 bonus. New customers only. Minimum £10 stake on odds of 1/2 (1.5) or greater on sportsbook (excluding Virtual markets). Further terms apply. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New customers only. Register, deposit with Debit Card, and place first bet £10+ at Evens (2.0)+ on Sports within 7 days to get 3 x £10 in Sports Free Bets & 2 x £10 in Acca Free Bets within 10 hours of settlement. 7-day expiry. Eligibility exclusions & T&Cs Apply. | |
| |
New cust only. Opt-in required. Deposit & place a bet within 7 days and settle a £10 minimum bet at odds of 4/5 (1.8) or greater to be credited with 3 x £10 Free Bets: 1 x £10 horse racing, 1 x £10 Free Bet Builder and 1 x £10 football. Free Bets cannot be used on e-sports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 7 day expiry. Stake not returned. 18+. T&Cs apply. Acca Club: Available to new & existing customers. 3 or more selections. Min Odds: 3/10 (1.3) per leg. Max stake: £500. Max Winnings: £200,000 per boost. Profit Boost amounts vary. Horse Racing, Greyhounds & Trotting excluded. Exclusions apply. Full T&C’s apply. 18+ GambleAware.org. | |
 | |
New members only. £10+ bet on sports (ex. Virtuals) 1.5 min odds, settled within 14 days. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days; £20 use on sportsbook, £10 on Bet Builder. Stake not returned. T&Cs.+ deposit exclusions apply #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New bettors. Select bonus at signup or use code SPORT. Wager deposit & bonus 8x. Max qualifying bet = bonus. Valid 60 days. Odds, bet & payment limits apply. T&Cs Apply; 18+ | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
New customers only, 18+. Min deposit £10. Place a £50 bet on any sport at 2.0+ to qualify for £25 in free bets and 10 Free Spins. Free Bets and Spins valid 7 days. £0.10 Free Spins. T&Cs apply. Please bet responsibly. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New members only. £10 min deposit & bet on sportsbook (ex. virtuals), placed & settled at 1.5 min odds in 14 days of sign-up. Win part of E/W bets. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days, use on sportsbook only (ex. virtuals), stakes not returned. T&Cs Apply and deposit exclusions apply. Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+ New customers only. Opt in, and bet £10 on football markets (odds 2.00+). No cash out. Get 6x£5 football free bets at specified odds for set markets, which expire after 7 days. Offer valid from 12:00 UK Time on 25/08/2023. Card payments only. T&Cs Apply | gambleaware.org | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
