bet365
BetMGM
Betfred
BetVictor
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
EasyBet
Burnley vs Notts County: EFL Cup Clash Puts Contrasting Form Under the Microscope. Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
Burnley’s defensive struggles, conceding 81 goals in 42 matches with only 10% clean sheets, combined with Notts County’s strong attacking record of 82 goals in 54 matches and 46.2 dangerous attacks per game, suggest both sides are likely to score despite Burnley’s home woes and midfield absences.
A 2-1 scoreline balances Burnley’s superior squad quality and attacking threats with their defensive vulnerabilities. Notts County’s momentum and ability to create numerous attacks supports a close contest, making a narrow home win the most plausible outcome.
Compare form, H2H, goals trends and key data for Burnley v Notts County.
Burnley welcome Notts County to Turf Moor on Saturday 8 August for an EFL Cup first-round tie carrying rather more intrigue than the divisional gap might suggest.
Burnley vs Notts County — bet365 Market Snapshot
Swipe through key markets with illustrative probabilities and sample bet365 odds based on our match analysis.
Burnley’s higher division status contrasts with Notts County’s strong recent form, setting up a competitive cup tie.
Burnley’s defensive record and Notts County’s attacking volume suggest a match with goals from both sides.
Burnley’s attacking quality and Notts County’s resilience point to a narrow 2-1 home win.
Burnley’s possession and passing control contrasts with Notts County’s higher attacking frequency and dangerous attacks.
Three Punchy Stats
- Burnley have won none of their last six competitive matches, drawing two and losing four, while Notts County have won three of their last six and lost only once. That is a striking reversal of what the difference in league level might initially imply.
- Notts County have scored 82 goals in 54 matches, averaging 1.52 per game, compared with Burnley's 47 in 42 at an average of 1.12. County also lead the shot comparison at 11.17 attempts per match to Burnley's ten.
- Burnley have failed to win any of their last six home matches, recording three draws and three defeats. Notts County, meanwhile, won three of their final six away fixtures, including three victories without conceding.
Attacking Efficiency Comparison
Burnley and Notts County show contrasting attacking profiles.
Burnley’s attacking output gives Notts County a clear tactical problem to solve.
Notts County can trouble Burnley by turning promising attacks into cleaner final actions.
Defensive Solidity Comparison
Defensive records highlight Burnley’s vulnerabilities contrasts with County’s resilience.
Burnley’s defensive shape will be tested whenever Notts County increase the tempo.
Notts County must match Burnley’s discipline and avoid conceding cheap openings.
The Clarets enter the new campaign as a Championship side, while Notts County begin life in League One after promotion. On paper, that gives Burnley the higher starting point. Recent performances, however, paint a considerably more complicated picture.
Burnley finished their previous competitive run without a victory in their final six matches, drawing twice and losing four times. Notts County closed theirs with three wins, two draws and only one defeat across the same six-game sample.
That contrast creates the central tension at Turf Moor. Burnley have the stronger divisional status but arrive needing to rediscover winning momentum. County come from a lower level but have shown a much healthier capacity to get results.
Burnley Need Their Possession to Produce More
Burnley's most recent competitive match was a 1-1 home draw with Wolverhampton Wanderers. They held 64% possession, registered eight shots on target and scored through Zian Flemming.
Those figures underline why possession alone cannot define this side.
Across 42 matches, Burnley averaged 396.38 passes and 44% possession, scoring 47 goals at 1.12 per game while conceding 81 at 1.93 per match. Their overall goal difference across that sample is therefore a major concern.
The attacking numbers are not disastrous, but neither are they especially intimidating. Burnley produced an average of ten shots per game, with 34% on target and 63% coming from inside the penalty area.
Getting attempts from central or penalty-box positions is generally preferable because those areas tend to offer cleaner shooting opportunities. The problem is turning enough of that activity into goals.
Burnley's recent home results make that issue impossible to ignore. Their last six home matches produced no wins, three draws and three defeats. They scored six times during that sequence but also failed to score against Manchester City, Brighton and Bournemouth.
There is no gentle way to dress that up: Turf Moor has not recently functioned like the sort of fortress a higher-division team would want before facing promoted opposition.
Notts County Arrive With Momentum
Notts County's final competitive outing could hardly have been more different.
They beat Salford City 3-0 at Wembley, having led 2-0 at half-time. Their final six matches brought victories over Salford City, Chesterfield and Colchester United, draws with Chesterfield and Bristol Rovers, and only one defeat, against Barnet.
That means County won 50% of those six fixtures and lost just 17%.
Their broader attacking profile also stands out. Across 54 matches they scored 82 goals, an average of 1.52 per game, while conceding 61 at 1.13 per match. They scored in 42 of those 54 fixtures, equivalent to 78%.
County also averaged 11.17 shots per game compared with Burnley's ten. Their on-target share was 38%, four percentage points higher than Burnley's 34%, while 67% of their attempts were taken from inside the box.
That combination suggests a side capable of repeatedly moving attacks into useful shooting territory.
Their average possession figure of 55% is another interesting element. It does not automatically mean County will dominate the ball at Turf Moor, particularly against Championship opposition, but it does show they are comfortable constructing attacks rather than relying purely on isolated counter-attacks.
They averaged 439.76 passes per game, although their pass accuracy of 78% was slightly below Burnley's 80%.
The Territory Battle Could Decide the Tie
Perhaps the most revealing comparison comes from attacking volume.
Notts County averaged 95.41 total attacks per match and 46.2 dangerous attacks. Burnley's corresponding figures were 85.69 and 40.05.
A dangerous attack is useful as a measure of territorial pressure rather than a guarantee of a clear chance. It essentially helps illustrate how frequently a team advances into threatening areas.
County's advantage in both measures fits with their superior scoring average and greater number of shots.
Burnley therefore face an awkward tactical problem. Allowing the visitors to settle into sustained possession could give County confidence, yet becoming overly aggressive would risk opening spaces against a side that finished the previous campaign in significantly better form.
Cup football does enjoy laughing at league tables, usually at the exact moment somebody starts trusting them too much.
Burnley's Defensive Record Raises the Pressure
Burnley conceded almost two goals per game across their 42-match sample, and their recent results include a 4-1 defeat to Nottingham Forest, a 3-1 loss against Leeds United and a 3-4 home defeat to Brentford.
They recorded only four clean sheets across those 42 matches, an average of 0.1 per game.
Notts County managed 16 clean sheets in 54, averaging 0.3 per fixture.
That difference matters because a knockout match can quickly become uncomfortable if the stronger-ranked side concedes first. Burnley's average first goal arrived in the 49th minute, while County's came in the 41st.
County have also demonstrated an ability to protect narrow advantages away from home. Their final six away matches included 1-0 victories at Chesterfield and Colchester United and a 2-0 success at Harrogate Town.
Their away form was not flawless — Cambridge United beat them 4-0 and Oldham Athletic won 3-0 — so there is vulnerability too. Three wins and three defeats from those six away fixtures perfectly captures their capacity for both efficiency and volatility.
Why the First Goal Could Be Particularly Important
The opening phase deserves close attention because neither side has recently looked built for carefree football.
Burnley's final six competitive matches contained only one occasion when they scored more than once, the 2-2 draw with Aston Villa. Notts County's final six included three clean sheets and four matches in which they conceded no more than one goal.
There is also evidence of relatively restrained scoring around County. Seven of their last ten games finished with fewer than three goals, while four of their final five matches of the previous season also stayed below that threshold.
Their pre-season attacking output has subsequently been limited, with one goal across their last four friendlies.
Burnley have encountered similar problems in front of goal during pre-season. They scored six times across six friendlies and managed more than one goal in only one of them.
None of that means the game must become defensive. It does mean that wasting the first clear chances could be particularly costly.
Set Pieces and Second Balls Offer Another Route
The teams' corner numbers hint at another possible battleground.
Burnley averaged 3.79 corners per game across their wider sample, compared with County's 4.72. Notts County also averaged more throws, more total attacks and more dangerous attacks, which reinforces the picture of a team accustomed to operating high enough up the pitch to generate repeated restarts.
County's physical involvement is reflected elsewhere. They averaged 11.7 fouls and 16.67 tackles per game, compared with Burnley's 10.14 fouls and 16.36 tackles.
Those are relatively narrow differences, but in a cup tie they could become significant around loose balls, midfield duels and broken passages of play.
Burnley may possess the higher divisional standing, but they cannot afford a passive contest in which County are repeatedly allowed to contest second balls around the Clarets' defensive third.
Availability Gives Burnley Another Issue to Manage
Burnley have M. Ndayishimiye unavailable with an unspecified injury, while J. Cullen is sidelined with a cruciate ligament tear.
No unavailable Notts County players are identified.
That leaves Burnley managing an already challenging competitive reset with two midfielders absent. Their response in central areas could be particularly relevant against a County side that have demonstrated substantial passing and possession numbers of their own.
A Cup Tie With More Balance Than the League Labels Suggest
There is an obvious temptation to reduce this match to Championship against League One, but the recent profiles demand a more thoughtful interpretation.
Burnley's challenge is largely about control turning into consequence. They can circulate the ball efficiently, demonstrated by their 80% pass accuracy, and their latest competitive fixture showed they can dominate possession. Yet they have lacked victories, clean sheets and consistent scoring.
Notts County's challenge is different. They must translate impressive lower-league numbers into a match against higher-level opposition. Their recent form, attacking volume and defensive record give them reasons for confidence, but their away results also show how dramatically performances can swing.
Emotionally, the pressure is probably easier to understand than any spreadsheet. Burnley are at home and occupy the higher division; anything other than authority will invite tension around Turf Moor. County can approach the occasion knowing their recent competitive run gives them every reason to make themselves deeply irritating visitors.
And in the EFL Cup, being deeply irritating is practically a tactical qualification.
Burnley have the opportunity to reset after a six-match winless finish, while Notts County arrive with promotion behind them and a 3-0 Wembley victory as their most recent competitive memory. The result may ultimately depend less on reputation than on which side can impose its preferred territory, turn possession into genuine chances and handle the pressure when the match stops behaving according to the league hierarchy.
Other Opportunities in This Market
Wagers across match outcome and goal total markets offer distinct balances between risk and potential reward. Cautious strategies often favour broader selections such as Double Chance or Draw No Bet, which provide structural safety against competitive variance but deliver lower odds margins. Higher-risk options like exact Correct Score or Score & Match Result combinations offer significantly wider prices, compensating for their narrow margin of error. Game-state shifts, late defensive substitutions, and early goals dramatically influence these markets, as a single late strike can alter both total goal tallies and exact score brackets.
📊 Market Explainer
Both Teams to Score (BTTS)
Selection: Both Teams To Score YES. Both teams must score at least once during normal time. The match winner does not matter; the selection is settled only by whether each side finds the net.
Correct Score Market
Selection: Burnley vs Notts County 2-1. Predict the exact score at the end of 90 minutes plus stoppage time. Extra time and penalties do not count unless the bookmaker states otherwise.
🎯 Pick 1: Both Teams To Score YES @ 20/23
Burnley enter this EFL Cup tie seeking defensive repair after conceding 81 goals across 42 matches at an average of 1.93 goals per game. Their backline registered clean sheets in just 10% of those fixtures, highlighting persistent defensive concessions. At Turf Moor, Burnley went winless across their final six home games, conceding six goals during that period while surrendering multi-goal leads in matches such as a 3-4 defeat to Brentford. Offensively, Burnley still maintain steady production, averaging ten shots per match with 63% taken inside the penalty box. They scored in home encounters against top opposition and held 64% possession while attempting eight shots on target in their recent 1-1 draw with Wolverhampton Wanderers.
Notts County possess formidable attacking numbers that support their capacity to score at Turf Moor. County scored 82 goals in 54 matches at an average of 1.52 per game, finding the net in 78% of their competitive outings. They maintain an average of 11.17 shots per match with 38% hitting the target and 67% generated from inside the penalty area. Furthermore, County generate 46.2 dangerous attacks per match, reflecting sustained pressure in opposition territory. With Burnley missing central midfielders M. Ndayishimiye and J. Cullen, the hosts face reduced structural protection in front of their defence. This setup provides ideal conditions for both teams to find the back of the net during standard regulation time.
🎯 Tactical Indicators
- Burnley averaged 1.93 goals conceded per game and managed clean sheets in only 10% of their 42 matches.
- Notts County scored in 78% of their 54 matches, averaging 1.52 goals per game and 46.2 dangerous attacks.
- Burnley enter without central midfielders M. Ndayishimiye and J. Cullen, exposing central defensive zones.
Risk Factor: Pre-season scoring was limited, with Burnley scoring six goals in six friendlies and Notts County scoring once in four.
Key Tactical Mismatch
Averaging 95.41 total attacks and 46.2 dangerous attacks per match, creating consistent entries into threatening areas.
Averaging 1.93 goals conceded per game with clean sheets in only 4 of 42 matches, compounded by midfield injuries.
🎯 Pick 2: Burnley vs Notts County 2-1 @ 7/1
A 2-1 victory for Burnley reflects the balance between higher-tier squad quality and persistent defensive vulnerability. Burnley average 396.38 passes per match with an 80% pass accuracy rate, allowing them to establish baseline control at Turf Moor. Despite a six-match winless finish to their prior league campaign, Burnley retain primary attacking threats through Zian Flemming, Lyle Foster, and Ashley Barnes. With 63% of their ten shots per game originating inside the penalty area, Burnley carry the quality to breach a Notts County defence that conceded 61 goals in 54 matches and suffered away defeats such as 4-0 at Cambridge United and 3-0 at Oldham Athletic.
Notts County’s strong momentum keeps them fully competitive throughout this tie. Winning three of their final six matches, including a 3-0 Wembley triumph over Salford City, County average 95.41 total attacks and 55% ball possession. Their ability to construct forward moves enables them to strike against a Burnley side that conceded in 38 of their 42 fixtures. However, the divisional step-up and Burnley’s individual attacking quality make a single-goal margin the most plausible outcome. A 2-1 scoreline accounts for Burnley securing the home win while acknowledging County’s capacity to capitalise on Burnley’s ongoing defensive flaws.
Burnley’s average of 1.93 goals conceded per match aligns with Notts County’s 1.52 scoring rate to support a 2-1 final result.
Risk Factor: Seven of Notts County's last ten competitive fixtures ended with under 2.5 goals scored.
Frequently Asked Questions
What does Both Teams To Score YES mean in football betting?
Both Teams To Score YES requires both teams to score at least one goal during standard regular time. The wager wins if the final score is 1-1, 2-1, 1-2, or any higher scoreline involving goals for both sides, regardless of which team wins the match.
How does the Correct Score market work for Burnley vs Notts County?
The Correct Score market requires predicting the exact final scoreline at the end of 90 minutes plus injury time. A selection of Burnley 2-1 Notts County wins only if Burnley score twice and Notts County score once before the final whistle.
Do goals scored in extra time count towards standard betting markets?
Standard main markets such as Both Teams To Score and Correct Score apply strictly to 90 minutes of regulation time plus stoppage time. Extra time and penalty shootouts are excluded from standard regular time selections unless specifically stated.
Why do Burnley's defensive figures favor Both Teams To Score YES?
Burnley conceded 81 goals across 42 matches and registered clean sheets in only 10% of those fixtures. Their high concession rate of 1.93 goals per game indicates consistent defensive vulnerability that allows visiting teams scoring opportunities.
How does Notts County's attacking volume support the predictions?
Notts County scored 82 goals in 54 matches and found the net in 78% of their competitive games while generating 46.2 dangerous attacks per match. This high frequency of forward entries demonstrates their capacity to threaten Burnley's goal.
How do player absences impact Burnley's midfield defensive stability?
Burnley enter without midfielders M. Ndayishimiye and J. Cullen due to injury. Missing central options reduces central defensive protection, making it easier for opposition attacks to build momentum through the middle third.
What is the difference between cautious and high-risk football markets?
Cautious markets like Double Chance cover multiple outcomes to lower risk, resulting in shorter odds. High-risk markets like Correct Score require absolute precision on the exact outcome, offering larger potential odds in exchange for a lower probability of winning.
Are pre-season friendly results reliable indicators for competitive cup ties?
Pre-season friendlies offer tactical context regarding fitness and goal volume, but competitive cup fixtures involve greater intensity and main squad selection. Both Burnley and Notts County experienced lower scoring output in recent friendlies, presenting a minor risk factor for goal-based picks.
