bet365
BetMGM
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
Augsburg vs Werder Bremen Predictions The mood around this Saturday’s Bundesliga meeting between Augsburg and Werder Bremen is shaped less by ambition and more by anxiety. Neither side expected to be peering nervously over their shoulder at this stage, yet that is exactly where they find themselves as the league heads towards the Christmas break. Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
▾
Hull City are tactically positioned to exploit Blackburn’s specific weaknesses. While Blackburn are strong at controlling territory, they are weak at defending counter-attacks—Hull’s primary offensive strength. The absence of Todd Cantwell significantly reduces Blackburn's creative variety, likely forcing them into a predictable wide-crossing game. Although Hull are missing Oli McBurnie, they possess sufficient individual talent in Joe Gelhardt and Ryan Giles to capitalize on transitions. Playing at the MKM Stadium, Hull’s ability to absorb pressure and strike quickly makes them a solid choice to progress in the cup.
▾
This scoreline reflects a competitive tie where both teams are likely to contribute to the scoreline. Hull average 1.6 goals per game, while Blackburn have consistently found the net but struggle to keep clean sheets against high-possession or counter-attacking sides. Blackburn’s crossing frequency should eventually test Hull’s aerial weakness, leading to a goal for the visitors. However, Hull’s efficiency on the break and Blackburn’s struggles with finishing should allow the Tigers to edge the contest by a single goal, maintaining the trend of Hull’s higher scoring output this season.
[bt4y_readers_tip]
Augsburg vs Werder Bremen Predictions and Best Bets
Augsburg vs Werder Bremen — BetMGM Market Snapshot
Swipe through selected markets with listed BetMGM prices and implied (from listed odds) percentages.
The percentages shown in the rings are implied (from listed odds). Prices displayed are the listed decimals for Augsburg, the draw, and Werder Bremen.
These scorelines are shown with listed prices and implied (from listed odds) percentages for a simple snapshot of the correct score board.
Listed prices for key goals lines, with implied (from listed odds) percentages shown alongside for context.
A simple view of selected first goalscorer listings shown with their displayed prices and implied (from listed odds) percentages.
- Augsburg’s defensive issues frame the challenge ahead: they concede an average of two goals per Bundesliga match, have kept just two clean sheets in 14 games, and face another side with similar attacking volume.
- Werder Bremen’s league position is built on narrow margins, with 18 goals scored and 28 conceded in 14 matches, highlighting why so many of their games remain undecided late on.
- Shot volume is almost identical, with Augsburg averaging 12.36 shots per match and Werder Bremen 12.5, suggesting the difference is more about efficiency and game control than chance creation.
Match Tempo: How Often Their Games Clear 2.5 Goals
Both sides have seen plenty of lively scorelines this season, and their identical over-2.5 rates hint at matches that can open up quickly once the first goal lands.
Their overall match-goals average sits at 3.21, which fits a season where Augsburg fixtures rarely stay quiet for long.
Werder’s match-goals average is 3.29, reinforcing the idea that their games can swing between chances and chaos.
Defensive Stability: Clean Sheet Rate
Clean sheets are a blunt but useful snapshot: they show how often a side can keep the whole operation watertight across 90 minutes.
Augsburg have 2 clean sheets in 14 league matches, with 28 goals conceded overall and 2.00 conceded per match.
Werder have 3 clean sheets in 14 league matches, and they also concede 2.00 per match — the difference is in how often they manage a full shutout.
Attacking Pressure: Shots & On-Target Tendencies
Shot volume doesn’t guarantee goals, but it does tell you who spends more time asking questions in the final third — and who tests goalkeepers more regularly.
Augsburg average 3.93 shots on target per match, and they land over 3.5 shots on target in 64% of league games.
Werder average 4.57 shots on target per match, and they land over 3.5 shots on target in 71% of league games.
Can Augsburg’s wing-back system steady them against Werder Bremen’s fragile momentum?
Three points here would not solve everything, but it would offer a rare exhale before the pause. Augsburg begin the weekend just a couple of points above the relegation zone, sitting 15th after 14 matches. Werder Bremen are only slightly better placed in 12th, though their position masks a worrying recent trend: a four-match winless run that has slowed what was an initially steadier campaign. Both teams have collected four league wins so far, both have conceded 28 goals, and both average exactly two goals conceded per match. There is symmetry here, but not comfort.
This fixture, listed for Saturday 20 December, comes with the sense of a crossroads. Augsburg’s season has been characterised by volatility, heavy defeats punctuating hard-earned wins. Werder Bremen’s path has been flatter, but equally frustrating, with draws and losses stacking up just often enough to prevent momentum. In a league where margins near the bottom are thin, this feels like the sort of match that lingers in the memory come spring.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Augsburg’s possible starting line-up reads: Dahmen; Banks, Schlotterbeck, Zesiger; Fellhauer, Jakic, Massengo, Giannoulis; Rieder, Claude-Maurice; Kade.
That selection points towards a back three, with Noahkai Banks, Keven Schlotterbeck and Cédric Zesiger forming the defensive base in front of Finn Dahmen. The wing-back roles are likely to fall to Robin Fellhauer on the right and Dimitris Giannoulis on the left, with Kristijan Jakic and Han-Noah Massengo anchoring the centre. Ahead of them, Fabian Rieder and Alexis Claude-Maurice sit behind Anton Kade.
It is a shape that prioritises numbers between the lines and flexibility in wide areas. Giannoulis’ presence is particularly notable, given his contribution at both ends of the pitch this season, while Rieder’s role as a connector behind the striker is central to how Augsburg progress the ball.
Werder Bremen’s possible XI is: Backhaus; Sugawara, Pieper, Stark, Schmidt; Stage, Lynen; Puertas, Schmid, Njinmah; Grüll.
This looks more like a traditional back four, with Yukinari Sugawara and Isaac Schmidt as full-backs either side of Amos Pieper and Niklas Stark. Jens Stage and Senne Lynen form a double pivot in midfield, while Cameron Puertas, Romano Schmid and Justin Njinmah operate behind Marco Grüll.
The contrast in structures is immediate. Augsburg’s three-at-the-back system offers natural width through wing-backs, while Werder Bremen’s four-man defence relies more on wide midfielders to stretch play. Stage’s inclusion is significant not just tactically but numerically, as Bremen’s leading scorer this season.
How the Match Could Be Played
The opening phases are likely to be shaped by caution. Augsburg’s recent results show a team capable of both scoring and conceding quickly, and that volatility tends to encourage restraint early on. With three centre-backs, Augsburg can build patiently from deep, inviting pressure before trying to release Giannoulis or Fellhauer into space down the flanks.
Jakic and Massengo are key to that plan. Positioned ahead of the defence, they provide passing lanes through the middle and protection against counter-attacks. If they can receive cleanly and turn, Augsburg can move the ball into Rieder and Claude-Maurice between the lines, forcing Werder Bremen’s midfield to collapse inward. That, in turn, opens the wings.
Werder Bremen’s likely response is to keep their midfield pair compact and deny those pockets. Stage and Lynen are tasked with screening rather than chasing, allowing Schmid and Puertas to press selectively from wider positions. Bremen’s possession average of 48% suggests they are comfortable sharing the ball, and away from home they often sit a little deeper before springing forward.
Transitions feel crucial. Augsburg average 12.36 shots per match, while Werder Bremen are just above that at 12.5, indicating that both sides can generate volume when games open up. The difference lies in how those chances are created. Augsburg’s wing-back system can lead to quick switches and crosses, while Bremen’s front four are more inclined to combine centrally before releasing runners like Njinmah.
Grüll’s role is another tactical hinge. As the lone forward, he must occupy Augsburg’s back three and create space for late arrivals. Augsburg’s centre-backs are not shy about stepping out, which could leave gaps if Bremen’s attacking midfielders time their runs well. Conversely, if Augsburg pin Bremen back, Kade can become isolated unless Rieder consistently supports him.
Set-piece territory also matters here. Both teams concede an average of two goals per match, often as a result of sustained pressure rather than single errors. Winning territory, forcing throw-ins and free-kicks, and keeping the ball in advanced zones could be as valuable as moments of individual flair.
Free Bet Offers
Swipe to see more →
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
The Numbers That Support the Story
Augsburg’s league position is underpinned by a points-per-game return of 0.93, built from four wins, one draw and nine defeats. They have scored 17 goals and conceded 28, a negative goal difference that reflects how often matches slip away from them. On average, they score 1.21 goals per game but concede exactly two, meaning they need to score twice simply to stay level.
Werder Bremen’s profile is strikingly similar defensively. They have also conceded 28 goals, averaging two per match, but their attacking output is marginally better at 1.29 goals per game. That slight edge explains why they sit three places higher, despite sharing the same number of wins as Augsburg.
Expected goals figures reinforce the sense of vulnerability on both sides. Augsburg’s expected goals against stands at 1.57 per match, while Werder Bremen’s is higher at 1.86. In practical terms, both teams allow chances that would normally result in goals, which aligns with the high match-goal averages: 3.21 for Augsburg fixtures and 3.29 for Werder Bremen’s.
Shot data adds further context. Augsburg average 12.36 shots per match with a conversion rate of 10%, while Werder Bremen take 12.5 shots with the same conversion rate overall, rising to 14% away from home. That suggests Bremen can be more efficient on their travels, even if they concede more chances in return.
Clean sheets are rare. Augsburg have kept two in 14 matches, Werder Bremen three. Neither side has made a habit of shutting games down, which explains why so many of their fixtures remain alive deep into the second half.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first key moment may come in the wide areas. If Giannoulis and Fellhauer are able to push Werder Bremen’s full-backs back, Augsburg can tilt the pitch and sustain pressure. If Sugawara and Schmidt hold their ground, Bremen can force Augsburg into slower, more predictable build-up.
Another swing factor lies with Fabian Rieder. Augsburg’s top scorer with three goals and joint-leading assist provider, his influence between the lines determines whether Augsburg’s possession turns into threat or fizzles out. Werder Bremen’s ability to crowd him out without losing shape elsewhere could decide how comfortable they feel defensively.
For Bremen, Jens Stage is the obvious focal point. With five league goals, he remains their most reliable finisher, often arriving late rather than operating as a classic striker. Augsburg’s midfield pairing must track those runs, especially when the ball is recycled wide and crosses are delayed rather than delivered early.
The latter stages could become chaotic. Both teams concede goals regularly in the second half, and neither boasts a strong clean-sheet record late on. Fatigue, concentration lapses and second balls around the box may shape the final quarter of the match more than any pre-planned tactic.
What could go wrong with this read? Plenty. Augsburg’s season has already featured extreme scorelines, both for and against, while Werder Bremen have swung from emphatic wins to heavy defeats within the same month. A red card, an early goal, or a spell of sustained pressure could rip up any sense of structure and turn this into something far less controlled than expected.
Best Bet for Augsburg vs Werder Bremen
[bt4y_article_veil]
Both Teams to Score (Yes)
Rationale
The statistical data for both Augsburg and Werder Bremen point overwhelmingly toward a fixture where defensive stability is secondary to offensive output. Both clubs enter this match with identical defensive records, having conceded 28 goals in 14 matches. This translates to an average of exactly two goals conceded per match for each side. When two teams with such porous backlines meet, the likelihood of a clean sheet for either side is statistically low. In fact, clean sheets have been a rarity throughout the campaign; Augsburg have managed only two shutouts in 14 outings, while Werder Bremen have recorded only three.
Offensively, both teams maintain a consistent scoring rate that complements their defensive vulnerabilities. Augsburg score an average of 1.21 goals per game, while Werder Bremen are slightly more productive at 1.29 goals per game. Crucially, the expected goals against (xGA) figures suggest that both teams regularly allow high-quality chances; Augsburg’s xGA is 1.57 per match, while Werder Bremen’s is even higher at 1.86. These numbers indicate that even if the teams are not clinical, the sheer volume and quality of opportunities conceded make scoring highly probable for both sides.
The tactical setups further support this outcome. Augsburg’s reliance on offensive wing-backs like Giannoulis and Fellhauer naturally leaves space in wide areas for Werder Bremen’s attackers, specifically runners like Njinmah and the late-arriving Jens Stage, to exploit. Conversely, Werder Bremen’s high xGA away from home suggests they struggle to contain sustained pressure, such as the 12.36 shots Augsburg average per match. Given that the match goal averages for both teams are above 3.2, and both share a 10% shot conversion rate, the evidence strongly supports a scenario where both goalkeepers are beaten at least once.
What could go wrong The primary risk to this selection is a “stalemate of anxiety.” Because both teams are situated near the relegation zone and desperate for points before the festive break, there is a chance they could adopt an ultra-conservative approach. If both sides prioritize a “don’t lose” mentality over winning, the game could devolve into a cagey midfield battle with few risks taken, potentially resulting in a low-scoring or scoreless affair that defies their season-long defensive trends.
Correct score lean
2-2
Rationale
A 2-2 draw is the most logical lean based on the specific goal averages and defensive frailties provided. Both teams concede exactly 2.0 goals per match on average. Furthermore, the match goal averages—3.21 for Augsburg and 3.29 for Werder Bremen—suggest that a high-scoring event is more likely than a low-scoring one. Werder Bremen’s away conversion rate rises to 14%, and Augsburg average nearly 2.0 goals conceded regardless of venue. With both sides having identical wins and defensive records, a high-scoring stalemate where they cancel each other out defensively fits the narrative of their mirrored seasons perfectly.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
| |
New customers: Deposit £10+ in 7 days & bet on sports. Min odds apply. Reward = 4 x £10 Free Bets (2 x £10 Bet Builders & 2 x £10 Sports Bet). Valid 7 days. Free bets not valid on eSports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 18+. T&Cs apply. | |
| |
Open Account Offer - New Customers only. Bet £10 and get £30 in Free Bets when you join bet365. Sign up, deposit between £5 and £10 to your account and bet365 will give you three times that value in Free Bets when you place qualifying bets to the same value settle. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits. Min odds/bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. T&Cs , time limits & exclusions apply. Registration Required. #Ad. 18+ Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New cust only. Opt-in required. Deposit & place a bet within 7 days and settle a £10 minimum bet at odds of 4/5 (1.8) or greater to be credited with 3 x £10 Free Bets: 1 x £10 horse racing, 1 x £10 Free Bet Builder and 1 x £10 football. Free Bets cannot be used on e-sports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 7 day expiry. Stake not returned. 18+. T&Cs apply. Acca Club: Available to new & existing customers. 3 or more selections. Min Odds: 3/10 (1.3) per leg. Max stake: £500. Max Winnings: £200,000 per boost. Profit Boost amounts vary. Horse Racing, Greyhounds & Trotting excluded. Exclusions apply. Full T&C’s apply. 18+ GambleAware.org. | |
| |
New customers only. Register, deposit with Debit Card, and place first bet £10+ at Evens (2.0)+ on Sports within 7 days to get 3 x £10 in Sports Free Bets & 2 x £10 in Acca Free Bets within 10 hours of settlement. 7-day expiry. Eligibility & payment exclusions apply. T&Cs Apply. | |
 | |
New members only. £10+ bet on sports (ex. Virtuals) 1.5 min odds, settled within 14 days. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days; £20 use on sportsbook, £10 on Bet Builder. Stake not returned. T&Cs.+ deposit exclusions apply #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New bettors. Select bonus at signup or use code SPORT. Wager deposit & bonus 8x. Max qualifying bet = bonus. Valid 60 days. Odds, bet & payment limits apply. T&Cs Apply; 18+ | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
New customers only, 18+. Min deposit £10. Place a £50 bet on any sport at 2.0+ to qualify for £25 in free bets and 10 Free Spins. Free Bets and Spins valid 7 days. £0.10 Free Spins. T&Cs apply. Please bet responsibly. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New members only. £10 min deposit & bet on sportsbook (ex. virtuals), placed & settled at 1.5 min odds in 14 days of sign-up. Win part of E/W bets. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days, use on sportsbook only (ex. virtuals), stakes not returned. T&Cs Apply and deposit exclusions apply. Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
