bet365
BetMGM
Betfred
BetVictor
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
EasyBet
Can Cheltenham turn set pieces and chaos into an FA Cup upset against Leicester? Read on for all our free predictions and betting tips.
To use the Live Streaming service you will need to be logged in and have a funded account or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. Geo location and live streaming rules apply.
▾
Both teams share significant defensive weaknesses, specifically in defending set pieces and wide attacks. Leicester’s tendency for individual errors and fouling in dangerous areas provides a clear path for Cheltenham to score, especially given the home side’s strength in direct free kicks. Conversely, Leicester’s offensive quality and high finishing rate should see them exploit a Cheltenham defense that has conceded 51 goals this season. The combination of these factors points toward an open game where neither keeper is likely to remain untested.
▾
A 2-1 scoreline aligns with the expectation that both teams will find the back of the net while acknowledging Leicester's superior squad depth and clinical finishing. Leicester averages 1.44 goals per game and is playing against a side two divisions lower, suggesting they will find the winner. However, their defensive record of 40 goals conceded in 27 games, paired with Cheltenham’s home momentum and set-piece threat, suggests the League Two side will at least claim a goal of their own.
[bt4y_readers_tip]
Cheltenham Town vs Leicester City Predictions and Best Bets
Cheltenham vs Leicester — William Hill Market Snapshot
Key markets with implied probabilities and William Hill odds based on current match performance data.
Leicester’s higher division status and technical quality reflect their strong position in the 90-minute market.
Both sides show defensive vulnerabilities in wide areas and at set pieces, increasing the likelihood of goals at both ends.
- Shot selection shapes the tie: Cheltenham take 10.19 shots per game with 46% from outside the box, while Leicester take 11.63 with 39% from range.
- Possession contrast drives the game plan: Leicester average 53% possession with 83% pass accuracy, while Cheltenham sit at 46% possession and 71% pass accuracy.
- Corners could decide everything because both are vulnerable: Cheltenham have 129 corners (4.03 per game) and Leicester have 135 (5 per game), with both weak defending set pieces.
Attacking Punch: Average Goals Scored
A comparison of offensive output across the current campaign for both teams.
Cheltenham rely on set-pieces and right-sided attacks, finding the net with regularity at home.
Leicester’s high pass accuracy (83%) allows them to create consistent chances through high possession.
Defensive Stability: Average Goals Conceded
Both sides have faced challenges keeping clean sheets, with vulnerabilities in wide areas.
Keeper Joe Day averages 3.84 saves per game, highlighting the frequent pressure on the backline.
Vulnerabilities at set pieces and individual errors have prevented a more consistent defensive record.
Cheltenham Town and Leicester City don’t get many days like this. The FA Cup third round has a habit of dangling a shiny possibility in front of clubs who spend most of the season dealing in graft, points and problem-solving, and both sides arrive here talking about an unlikely piece of silverware.
It’s Saturday afternoon, it’s the third round, and it’s at The EV Charger Points Stadium. The thermometer reads 5°, the kick-off is 19:15 on 10 January 2026, and the tie has a simple hook: Cheltenham, a League Two side coming off a much-needed win, against Leicester, a Championship team trying to make up ground in a promotion race.
Cheltenham’s recent run has been properly stop-start in results, but it includes a statement 3-0 win over Crawley Town on 4 January and a 3-1 win over Shrewsbury on Boxing Day. Leicester’s last six in the Championship is split straight down the middle — three wins, three defeats — and their most recent outing was a 2-1 home win over West Bromwich Albion on 5 January.
That’s the mood. One side with home momentum and a clear sense of what it wants the match to look like, the other with more of the ball, more of the pass, and more of the expectation. FA Cup ties don’t care about expectation, though. They care about moments, match-ups and mistakes. And both teams have weaknesses that invite exactly that.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Cheltenham’s possible starting XI reads like a back three: Day; Tomkinson, Cundy, Wilson; Stevenson, Jude-Boyd, Young, Kinsella, Thomas; Bickerstaff, Miller.
That shape fits their usual instincts. Cheltenham play with width, they attack down the right, they take long shots, and they’re comfortable playing in their own half. With three centre-backs and a five across midfield, the plan is clear: build a secure base, funnel play wide, and pick the moments to go direct into the front two.
The personnel points to where the fight will be. Cundy averages 6.4 aerials won and carries a 7.30 rating, while Tomkinson sits at 7.10. Day is ever-present with 25 league appearances. In midfield, Young brings bite — he’s got 5 in the aggression category and has chipped in with 2 goals — while Jordan Thomas provides the creative touch with 2 goals and 3 assists.
Leicester’s possible XI is a familiar 4-2-3-1 structure: Begovic; Pereira, Vestergaard, Nelson, L Thomas; James, Skipp; S Thomas, Page, Mavididi; Daka.
That matches Leicester’s wider identity: possession football, short passes, through balls, long shots and width, with a strong emphasis on attacking down the right. It also comes with an edge. Leicester are aggressive, and their weaknesses have a very cup-tie flavour — they’re very weak at avoiding individual errors and very weak at avoiding fouling in dangerous areas. That hands Cheltenham a clear route into the match: win territory, win set pieces, and turn the stadium into a loud little pressure cooker.
How the Match Could Be Played
This is a game of competing widths and competing vulnerabilities.
Cheltenham are very weak at defending against attacks down the wings and weak at defending set pieces. Leicester are weak at defending against attacks down the wings and weak at defending set pieces too. That means neither side can treat wide areas as a safe place to defend. Every overload, every switch, every run beyond a full-back has the potential to turn into a proper chance rather than harmless territory.
Leicester’s approach is the more expansive one. With James and Skipp sitting as a double pivot, Leicester can play short, draw pressure, then break lines through the number 10 and wide players. They attempt through balls often and play with width, so the key question becomes: do they get time to pick passes, or do Cheltenham make this uncomfortable by stepping in at the right moments?
Cheltenham’s strengths tell you how they want to do that. They’re strong at stealing the ball from the opposition, strong at protecting the lead, and strong at shooting from direct free kicks. In other words, Cheltenham don’t need long spells of possession to feel in control. They need a few well-timed turnovers, a couple of fouls won in good areas, and a game state where Leicester are chasing and making decisions at speed.
That’s where Leicester’s “very weak” traits become central. If Leicester give away fouls in dangerous areas, Cheltenham’s direct free-kick strength stops being a footnote and becomes a plan. And if Leicester’s individual errors appear, Cheltenham’s front two have a clear job: stay ready, stay alive, and punish the loose touch or the underhit backpass.
When Cheltenham have the ball, the likely pattern is right-sided emphasis and long shots. They attack down the right and they take long shots, which is a sensible route against a Leicester team that is weak at stopping opponents from creating chances and weak at defending against skillful players. Cheltenham don’t need to carve through the middle every time; they can get into crossing zones and force defensive actions, or they can work shooting angles and test whether Leicester’s press is sharp enough to block the lane.
Out of possession, Cheltenham’s back three gives them a solid platform to defend the box, but they are weak in aerial duels. That’s uncomfortable against a Leicester side with Vestergaard at the back and a forward line that wants deliveries and second balls. Vestergaard averages 3.8 aerials won and carries a 7.12 rating; if Leicester start landing corners and wide free-kicks, Cheltenham’s aerial weakness becomes a real problem in the most unforgiving area of the pitch.
Leicester also take long shots. So do Cheltenham. That means the edge of the box is going to be a busy place. Both sides want shots, and both sides are happy to pull the trigger. If midfield pressure drops even slightly, you get spells where the ball is recycled and hit early — the kind of rhythm that keeps goalkeepers engaged and defenders edgy.
The most interesting tactical duel might actually be about discipline rather than shape. Cheltenham have the kind of strengths that thrive on stoppages: direct free kicks, protecting leads, stealing possession. Leicester have the kind of weaknesses that create stoppages: fouling in dangerous areas and individual errors. If Cheltenham can turn the match into a sequence of set-piece moments and broken phases, Leicester’s passing game doesn’t get the calm it needs.
If Leicester keep it clean, keep it moving, and avoid those cheap fouls, the pitch tilts their way quickly. Their average possession sits at 53% with 83% pass accuracy, which is a huge contrast to Cheltenham’s 46% possession and 71% pass accuracy. Leicester can simply spend more of the match on the ball and in control of where it is played. That matters.
Free Bet Offers
Swipe to see more →
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
T&Cs Apply. Click to view.
The Numbers That Support the Story
Cheltenham’s overall picture is clear: across 32 matches they’ve scored 36 goals (1.13 per game) and conceded 51 (1.59 per game). That’s a side that can score, but lives with danger, which is exactly why stealing the ball and protecting a lead are so valuable. If they get in front, they have a stated strength for holding onto it.
Leicester’s record across 27 matches shows a more stable balance: 39 scored (1.44 per game) and 40 conceded (1.48 per game). That’s still not airtight at the back, and the weaknesses around set pieces and errors explain why. But it does tell you Leicester carry a more consistent attacking punch.
Shot profiles back up the idea of an open, shooting-heavy tie. Cheltenham have 326 total shots, 10.19 per game, with 46% of their shots coming from outside the box. Leicester have 314 total shots, 11.63 per game, and 39% from outside the box. Both teams pull the trigger, and both are comfortable doing it from range. That means the first block, the first deflection, the first rebound might matter as much as a perfectly worked move.
Corners also hint at sustained pressure. Cheltenham have 129 corners (4.03 per game) and Leicester have 135 (5 per game). With both sides weak at defending set pieces, that’s not just a statistic; that’s a warning label.
And while Leicester’s passing control is stronger — 9,889 accurate passes at 83% — Cheltenham’s match rhythm is about action rather than polish. They’ve logged 123 goalkeeper saves (3.84 per game) compared to Leicester’s 83 (3.07 per game). Cheltenham’s keeper gets worked more often; if Leicester settle into their passing, Day’s evening could be long.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first moment is Leicester’s discipline around the box. Leicester are very weak at avoiding fouling in dangerous areas, and Cheltenham are strong at shooting from direct free kicks. One needless clip, one late lunge, one panicked tug — and Cheltenham get exactly the kind of chance they want without needing open play.
The second is the aerial battle at set pieces. Both sides are weak at defending set pieces, and both sides earn corners at a decent rate. Vestergaard’s 3.8 aerials won and Cundy’s 6.4 tell you this won’t be pretty. It will be bodies, blocks, and who attacks the ball like they mean it.
The third is the wing battle. Cheltenham are very weak down the wings, and Leicester are weak down the wings too. Whoever turns width into clean deliveries and cutbacks — not just hopeful crosses — will rack up the biggest chances.
Finally, keep an eye on Leicester’s finishing. Leicester are strong at finishing scoring chances. That matters in a cup tie where you don’t get unlimited looks. If Leicester create three clear moments, they don’t need five.
What could go wrong with this read? The match has volatility written all over it: two teams happy to shoot from range, both shaky at set pieces, and Leicester carrying the sort of error-and-foul profile that can hand the home side cheap momentum.
Best Bet for Cheltenham vs Leicester City
[bt4y_article_veil]
Both Teams to Score (BTTS)
Rationale
The collision between Cheltenham Town and Leicester City at The EV Charger Points Stadium is defined by a shared defensive vulnerability that makes a clean sheet for either side unlikely. Both teams struggle significantly in wide areas and at set pieces, creating a tactical environment where scoring opportunities are frequent for both the underdog and the favorite.
Leicester City’s defensive profile is particularly prone to the types of goals that lower-league sides thrive on in the FA Cup. They are very weak at avoiding individual errors and have a recurring problem with fouling in dangerous areas. This is a critical flaw against a Cheltenham side that is notably strong at shooting from direct free kicks and attacking down the right wing. Cheltenham’s ability to “steal the ball” from the opposition means they will aggressively press for turnovers in the middle third, aiming to exploit the individual lapses that have characterized Leicester’s season.
While Leicester possesses superior technical quality—averaging 53% possession and an 83% pass accuracy—they have conceded 40 goals in 27 matches, failing to maintain a solid defensive footing. Their aggressive style and reliance on short passing often lead to the very turnovers Cheltenham is built to punish. However, Leicester’s offensive threat remains potent. They are strong at finishing scoring chances and frequently use through balls and width to bypass defensive blocks. Given that Cheltenham is very weak at defending against attacks down the wings and has conceded 51 goals in 32 matches, Leicester’s attacking quartet, led by the likes of Stephy Mavididi and Patson Daka, should have little trouble finding the net.
With both teams possessing identical weaknesses in defending set pieces and wide attacks, the match rhythm is likely to be frantic. Both sides also favor long shots, ensuring that goalkeepers Joe Day and Asmir Begovic will be tested from distance throughout the 90 minutes.
What could go wrong?
The primary risk to this selection is a “professional” performance from Leicester where they use their 83% pass accuracy to simply starve Cheltenham of the ball. If the visitors manage to suppress the crowd by keeping possession in non-threatening areas and avoid the individual errors that have plagued them, they could potentially win to nil. Additionally, if Cheltenham’s aerial weakness is exploited early, they may retreat into a low block that limits their own offensive output.
Correct score lean: 1-2
Rationale Leicester City’s higher tier of quality and clinical finishing should eventually tell, but their habit of committing fouls in dangerous areas and making unforced errors makes a clean sheet improbable. Cheltenham has shown they can score at home, evidenced by recent three-goal hauls against Crawley and Shrewsbury. However, the defensive disparity is real; Cheltenham concedes 1.59 goals per game compared to Leicester’s 1.48 in a much tougher division. A 2-1 victory for the visitors reflects Leicester’s status as favorites while acknowledging the persistent defensive leaks that Cheltenham is tactically equipped to exploit.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
[ninja_table_builder id=”419877″]
