bet365
BetMGM
William Hill
Betfred
BetUK
LiveScoreBet
10Bet
Virgin Bet
Can Ipswich’s possession game and set-piece strength break down Oxford’s low-block and offside trap at Portman Road? Read on for complete analysis and the best betting tips.
To use the Live Streaming service you will need to be logged in and have a funded account or to have placed a bet in the last 24 hours. Geo location and live streaming rules apply.
▾
Liverpool's 60.9% possession and Burnley's low shot volume (8.9/gm) suggest the visitors will rarely enter the attacking third.
▾
Dúbravka’s high save rate will prevent a total blowout, but Burnley’s weak wing defense will eventually concede to Liverpool's pressure.
Readers’ Tip
Vote your pick — quick & anonymous
Terms & Conditions (tap to view)
Ipswich Town vs Oxford United Predictions and Best Bets
Ipswich vs Oxford — bet365 Market Snapshot
Swipe through key markets with illustrative probabilities and sample bet365 odds based on our match analysis.
Ipswich’s formidable home record and Oxford’s poor travels make the hosts heavy favourites to take all three points.
With Ipswich scoring freely at home (3-0, 3-1 recently), the markets favour a comfortable home win with multiple goals.
Given Ipswich’s average of 1.66 goals per game and Oxford’s defensive frailty, the markets lean heavily towards Over 2.5 goals.
Jaden Philogene (8 goals) is a key threat for Ipswich, while Lankshear leads Oxford’s attack in what could be a high-tempo game.
- Ipswich’s control is built on volume: Ipswich have 40 goals in 24 Championship games and average 15.9 shots per match, matching a possession style built on 56.4% possession and 81.8% pass completion.
- Oxford’s away struggle meets a tight-scoring trend: Oxford have won just 4 of their last 37 away matches in all competitions, and their last four away Championship games have been under 2.5 goals.
- Chance creation runs through Núñez and Philogene: Marcelino Núñez has 7 assists and 3 goals, while Jaden Philogene has 8 goals and 2 assists, giving Ipswich multiple match-winning routes.
Attacking Volume: Shots per Game
Ipswich Town are one of the most aggressive attacking sides in the league, consistently creating high shot volumes.
Averaging nearly 16 shots per game reflects their dominance and ability to sustain pressure on opposition defences.
While Oxford create chances, they rely more on long shots and transition moments than sustained territory.
Control: Average Possession
The contrast in playing styles is evident in the possession numbers, with Ipswich dictating play and Oxford looking to disrupt.
Ipswich are comfortable building from the back and controlling the tempo in the opposition’s half.
Oxford are happy to cede possession, focusing instead on stealing the ball and launching quick counter-attacks.
Key Trend: Oxford’s Road Struggles
The visitors have found wins incredibly hard to come by on their travels, a trend that puts them at a disadvantage here.
With just four wins in their last 37 away games across all competitions, Oxford struggle to impose themselves outside of home turf.
New Year’s Day at Portman Road brings a familiar Championship split-screen: one club peering up at the automatic places, the other staring nervously at the trapdoor. Ipswich Town welcome Oxford United with the kind of incentive that sharpens every pass and every run — the chance to potentially move into the top two — while Oxford arrive three points adrift from safety and, as things stand, without a permanent manager.
Ipswich’s position is clearly defined. They are third with 41 points from 24 matches, trailing the automatic spots by two points, and they’ve built that platform on a strong goal difference of +17, with 40 scored and 23 conceded. Oxford are 22nd with 22 points from 24 matches, and their numbers show the strain: 24 goals scored and 33 conceded, a -9 goal difference that reflects a season of fine margins not falling their way often enough.
The recent results point to contrasting moods, too. Ipswich’s last six include wins over Coventry (3-0 at home, 2-0 away), Stoke (1-0), and Sheffield Wednesday (3-1), plus a 0-0 draw at Millwall; the only blot is a 3-1 defeat away at Leicester. Oxford’s last six have been tougher: defeats to Swansea twice (2-0 away and 1-0 at home), losses to Preston (2-1 at home) and Charlton (1-0 away), a 1-1 draw at Blackburn, and a 2-1 win over Southampton.
And the head-to-head needle is still warm. Oxford beat Ipswich 2-1 on 28 November 2025, leading 1-0 at half-time. That alone is enough to shape the psychology of the rematch: Ipswich don’t need to be told the risks, and Oxford don’t need convincing that a plan can work.
There’s also the sense of how each side wants to play. Ipswich are described as possession-based, built on short passes, with through balls and control in the opposition’s half, attacking through the middle and creating long-shot opportunities. Oxford, by contrast, are described as playing in their own half, taking lots of shots and long shots, mixing long balls, and attacking through the middle with a right-sided tilt, all while using an offside trap. Put those together and you get a match that could have two very distinct phases: Ipswich trying to build patiently and pin Oxford back, and Oxford trying to disrupt, steal, and spring forward quickly — not necessarily with long spells, but with sharp, opportunistic moments.
Team News and Likely Set-Ups
Ipswich’s possible starting lineup is listed as: Walton; Furlong, O’Shea, Kipre, Greaves; Matusiwa, Cajuste; Egeli, Nunez, Philogene; Azon.
That looks like a back four with a double pivot and three attacking midfielders behind a lone striker — a structure that fits Ipswich’s formation summary showing 4-2-3-1 as their seasonal Championship template (23 matches). The selection suggests Ipswich want stability at the base with Matusiwa and Cajuste, and then a fluid front four where Philogene, Nunez and Egeli can rotate around Azon.
William Hill
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
BetMGM
Bet £10 Get £40 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
bet365
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Betfred
Bet £10 Get £30 In Free Bets
Show Terms & Conditions
10bet
100% Up To £50 On First Deposit
Show Terms & Conditions
The defensive unit implied by that XI also offers specific clues about how Ipswich might manage Oxford’s direct threat. O’Shea and Kipre are named centrally, with Furlong and Greaves as full-backs. In possession, that can become a platform for controlled build-up and higher field position; without the ball, it’s the line that has to judge when to squeeze and when to protect space behind, particularly against a team described as using long balls and an offside trap themselves.
Oxford’s possible starting lineup is listed as: Cumming; Spencer, Helik, Brown, Currie; Krastev, Keersmaecker; Placheta, Goodrham, Mills; Lankshear.
Again, it reads like a 4-2-3-1. That aligns with Oxford’s formation summary, which shows 4-2-3-1 used in 10 Championship matches, and it sets up a neat tactical mirror: two sides with similar basic shapes, but very different instincts about where to take risks. Oxford’s back four looks built to compete physically and aerially through Helik and Brown, with Currie and Spencer likely asked to manage wide threats. In midfield, Krastev and De Keersmaecker suggest a double pivot that can screen and then release the ball forward quickly.
The attacking trio behind Lankshear points to how Oxford might try to land punches. Placheta, Goodrham and Mills give them a mix of direct running and support play around the striker. Lankshear is the focal point in this listed XI, and his season output supports that: 5 goals, with enough appearances to suggest he’s been part of the regular attacking picture.
Ipswich also have an “injured and suspended” list dated 30/12/2025, naming S. Szmodics (unknown injury), C. Kipre (knee injury), W. Burns (torn muscle fibre) and C. Townsend (cruciate ligament tear). With Kipre also appearing in the possible starting XI, that creates an obvious tension around availability at centre-half. Ipswich’s broader squad list also includes Kipré as a significant contributor this season, so that one decision has knock-on effects for structure, line height, and how bold Ipswich can be in squeezing the game into Oxford’s half.
How the Match Could Be Played
On paper this is a mirror match: 4-2-3-1 versus 4-2-3-1. In reality it could feel like two different sports being played on the same pitch.
Ipswich’s listed style is possession football with short passes, through balls, and a desire to control the game in the opposition’s half. That implies a team comfortable building from the back, moving the ball patiently, and gradually shifting opponents until the gap appears. The strengths list reinforces it: strong at creating scoring chances, strong at counter-attacks, strong at creating long-shot opportunities, strong at shooting from direct free kicks, strong at protecting the lead, strong in aerial duels, and strong at defending set pieces. That is a fairly complete set of tools, and it explains how Ipswich can carry both control and threat — you can dominate the ball, but you can also score in moments when dominance isn’t possible.
Oxford’s style, by contrast, is defined by disruption and pragmatism. They are listed as playing in their own half, taking lots of shots and long shots, using long balls, attacking through the middle and down the right, and playing the offside trap. Their strengths include stealing the ball from the opposition, creating scoring chances, and being strong at attacking set pieces and shooting from direct free kicks. Their weaknesses are severe: very weak at keeping possession, very weak at finishing scoring chances, and very weak at defending set pieces.
That combination suggests a clear Oxford plan at Portman Road. Without the ball, stay compact and disciplined, encourage Ipswich into predictable areas, and then pounce on loose touches or forced passes. When they win it, go quickly — not necessarily in ten-pass patterns, but by hitting the forward early, moving runners around him, and taking shots when the chance arises, especially from range.
The first tactical question is where Ipswich will try to create their overloads. Their style says attack through the middle, and the likely XI supports that: Nunez centrally in the line of three, with Philogene and Egeli in positions that can drift inside or stretch wide depending on the moment. If Ipswich can get Nunez turning between Oxford’s midfield and defensive lines, they can begin to access through balls — a listed Ipswich preference — into Azon’s runs or into the channels for Philogene.
Oxford’s double pivot — Krastev and De Keersmaecker — will be key to stopping that. If they hold their positions and deny the central pockets, Ipswich may be pushed wider than they’d like, asking full-backs to provide width and asking the wide attackers to beat their men. If Oxford instead step out aggressively to press, they risk opening the very spaces Ipswich want to use.
That tension becomes even sharper because Oxford’s own weakness is very weak defending set pieces. If Ipswich can make Oxford defend deep and repeatedly, corners and wide free-kicks become recurring pressure points. Ipswich are listed as strong at shooting from direct free kicks, and strong at defending set pieces themselves, which hints at a match where Oxford might have to work harder for their best dead-ball moments than Ipswich do.
Then there’s Oxford’s offside trap. Against a side that “attempt through balls often”, that’s a high-wire act. If it’s well-timed, it can snuff out Ipswich’s favourite route and turn the game into a series of stoppages, frustration, and resets. If it’s mistimed, it can be brutal, because a through ball behind a stepping line creates exactly the kind of clear break that a possession side spends all game trying to engineer.
In transition, Ipswich look well-equipped to punish Oxford’s approach. Oxford are strong at stealing the ball, and Ipswich’s weaknesses include avoiding individual errors, rated very weak. That is a volatile mix: Ipswich want to circulate possession and take territory; Oxford want to nick it and turn it into a chance. If Ipswich are sloppy, Oxford’s strengths line up perfectly. If Ipswich are clean and patient, Oxford may find themselves defending for long stretches without the relief of possession — and keeping possession is listed as a major Oxford weakness.
Oxford’s attacking patterns will likely be more direct. With Lankshear up front and runners like Placheta and Mills around him, they can look to play early into the striker and then attack second balls. Helik’s profile and Oxford’s aerial strengths list suggests they’ll be comfortable competing for first contacts too, whether that’s from goal-kicks, long diagonals, or set pieces. The danger for Ipswich is not only the long ball itself, but what happens next: if Oxford win the second ball in the inside-right channel, they can get shots away quickly, and Oxford’s style explicitly encourages long shots.
Ipswich, however, are also listed as strong at creating long-shot opportunities. That suggests a fascinating shared “moment type”: both sides might end up shooting from range, but for different reasons. Ipswich may do it as the end product of patient pressure and recycled possession around the box. Oxford may do it because their style invites it — win it, hit it, test the shape, and see what breaks.
The final tactical area is the right-side versus left-side battle. Oxford’s style highlights attacking down the right, and their likely XI includes Mills and Spencer on that side. Ipswich’s likely XI has Greaves as left-back and Philogene as one of the attacking midfielders. That creates a corridor where Oxford may try to force repeated decisions: does Ipswich’s wide attacker track back, does Greaves step out to engage, does the left centre-half shuffle across early? Those micro-decisions are how set pieces are won, how fouls are conceded, and how pressure builds.
If Ipswich can keep that flank under control and consistently restart attacks through their own shape, they can push Oxford back and ask the away side to defend their box repeatedly. If Oxford can make that area messy — turnovers, duels, rushed clearances — they give themselves a foothold in a match where they won’t expect to dominate possession.
The Numbers That Support the Story
Ipswich’s underlying volume paints a picture of a team built to impose. They have 40 goals in 24 Championship matches and average 15.9 shots per game in the competition, which is a high attacking churn. It matters because it suggests Ipswich don’t rely on a small number of moments; they generate repeated attempts, which increases the likelihood of pressure turning into goals, even when an opponent defends deep.
Their passing and possession numbers reinforce that control idea. Ipswich’s Championship possession is listed at 56.4% with 81.8% pass completion, and their passes total shows 10,907 with an average of 436.28 per game, 82% accurate, and 57% ball possession in the broader match set. Those figures describe a side that wants the ball, can keep it, and can move it with precision. Against Oxford, whose Championship possession is listed at 42.7% with 72.6% pass completion, and whose passes total shows 8,678 with 74% accurate and 44% possession, the expectation is clear: Ipswich will likely have long spells of the ball, and Oxford will likely spend long spells trying to disrupt.
Oxford’s attacking volume is not negligible, though. They average 13.1 shots per game in the Championship, and their total shots number is 345, around 13.27 per game in the broader breakdown. The key detail is where those shots come from: Oxford’s breakdown shows 51% inside the box and 49% outside, a near-even split that fits a side described as taking long shots. Ipswich’s own split is 65% inside and 35% outside. That matters because it hints at the quality and the nature of chances: Ipswich are more consistently getting their attempts from closer range, whereas Oxford are often shooting from further out, which can be a symptom of difficulty breaking teams down.
This ties directly into Oxford’s weakness: very weak finishing scoring chances. When a team struggles to finish, it can manifest as rushed shots, efforts from difficult angles, or reliance on lower-percentage attempts. Oxford’s long-shot tendency could be both a weapon and a limitation: it can create surprise moments, but it can also lead to a night of “decent hit, comfortable save” if Ipswich manage their box well.
Set pieces are the other obvious numbers-adjacent theme, because the qualitative labels are so stark. Oxford are described as strong at attacking set pieces and strong at shooting from direct free kicks, while also being very weak at defending set pieces. Ipswich are described as strong at defending set pieces and strong at shooting from direct free kicks. That sets up a tug-of-war where both sides might fancy dead-ball moments, but Ipswich have the defensive profile to manage them, while Oxford have the vulnerability that can make any corner or wide free-kick feel like a warning siren.
Individual output supports Ipswich’s multiple threats. Philogene has 8 goals and 2 assists with 2.1 shots per game. Núñez has 3 goals and 7 assists with 2.2 shots per game, making him a clear chance-creation hub. O’Shea and Greaves show aerial contributions too — Greaves with 4.7 aerials won per game, O’Shea with 4.0 — which matters if Oxford go direct and if set pieces become a feature. Matusiwa’s disciplinary line is also notable: 9 yellow cards. In a match where Oxford are strong at stealing the ball and Ipswich are rated very weak at avoiding individual errors, those transitional fouls — the ones that stop a break before it starts — can become a recurring theme.
Oxford’s key contributors show where they might find their openings. Helik’s rating is 7.04 and he contributes 2 assists, which hints at set-piece delivery or dead-ball involvement from deeper areas. De Keersmaecker has 1 goal and 4 assists with a strong 84.1% pass completion, suggesting that even in a team with possession issues, he can provide some composure and forward progression. Lankshear’s 5 goals gives Oxford a clear target, and Placheta’s 3 goals and 1 assist suggests he’s capable of producing a decisive action without needing lots of the ball.
Recent form adds context without needing to overstate it. Ipswich’s last six show four wins, one draw, one defeat, and their home run in the listed six shows four wins and two draws, with no defeats. Oxford’s last six show one win, one draw, four defeats, and their away run shows one win, two draws, three defeats in the listed six away matches. There’s also a trend line stating Oxford have won just 4 of their last 37 away matches in all competitions, alongside a note that Oxford’s last four away Championship matches have been under 2.5 goals. That combination suggests Oxford might arrive looking to keep it tight, stay in the game, and hunt for moments rather than try to outplay Ipswich in possession.
Finally, the league context explains why Ipswich’s approach should be assertive. They are third, two points off the automatic places, and this is the kind of home fixture where the pressure is not just to win, but to win while looking like a team that expects to be in the top two conversation.
Key “Moments” to Watch
The first moment to watch is the offside-trap duel. Oxford’s style includes playing the offside trap, while Ipswich’s style includes attempting through balls often. That’s a direct confrontation of ideas. If Oxford time their line well, Ipswich’s favourite pass becomes a frustration, and the match can slow into a steady pattern of Ipswich circulating and Oxford waiting. If Oxford mistime it once — just once — Ipswich’s front line can be in on goal quickly, and the tone changes.
The second moment is turnovers in central areas. Oxford are strong at stealing the ball from the opposition, and Ipswich are rated very weak at avoiding individual errors. That’s where risk lives. When Ipswich try to play short and control the game in Oxford’s half, any loose pass into midfield can become a transition for Oxford, and Oxford’s shot-heavy style means they won’t necessarily wait for the perfect opening before trying to test Walton.
The third moment is the edge-of-box shooting battle. Ipswich are strong at creating long-shot opportunities, and Oxford take long shots as part of their identity. With Oxford’s shot split almost half from outside the box, and Ipswich’s own strengths encouraging those situations, the match could feature spells where the ball keeps being recycled to the same zones and hit early. That matters not just for goals, but for second balls — blocks, rebounds, corners — and corners lead you back to the set-piece theme where Oxford’s defensive weakness is glaring.
Which brings us to the fourth moment: dead balls. Oxford are strong at attacking set pieces, Ipswich are strong at defending them. Ipswich are strong at defending set pieces and at shooting from direct free kicks, while Oxford are very weak at defending set pieces. This might be where the game feels most asymmetric. Ipswich can treat set pieces as a repeatable way to keep pressure on and create chances. Oxford may treat them as something to survive, and if they survive them, to use them at the other end as one of their best routes to threaten.
The fifth moment is the right-flank clash. Oxford’s right-sided lean, with Mills and Spencer on that side, meets Ipswich’s left-side personnel in Greaves and potentially Philogene tracking back or rotating. If Oxford can gain territory there, they can win throw-ins and corners, and make Ipswich defend facing their own goal — exactly the kind of scenario that can prompt the “individual error” Ipswich are trying to avoid. If Ipswich lock it down, Oxford may be pushed into longer, lower-percentage shots from range, and Ipswich can start to squeeze the game higher and higher.
What could go wrong with this read? The Championship rarely needs a reason. Ipswich can dominate possession and still find themselves dealing with one sharp turnover and a shot from 25 yards. Oxford can defend deep and well-timed for long spells and still concede from a single set-piece scramble. And in a match where one side wants control and the other wants disruption, the first goal can flip the whole script: the team behind becomes more frantic, the team ahead becomes more conservative, and the neat tactical plan becomes a series of reactions.
Best Bet for Ipswich Town vs Oxford United
[bt4y_article_veil]
Ipswich Town to Win & Over 2.5 Goals
The disparity between a side chasing automatic promotion and one fighting against relegation is starkest when examining the venue and offensive output. Ipswich Town have turned Portman Road into a fortress of attacking football, sitting third in the table with 40 goals scored—an average of 1.66 per game. Their recent home form underlines this dominance, with commanding 3-0 and 3-1 victories over Coventry and Sheffield Wednesday respectively. When Ipswich win at home, they tend to do so by overwhelming opponents with possession (averaging 56.4%) and high shot volume (15.9 per game), creating a tempo that struggling teams find difficult to contain for 90 minutes.
Tactically, this matchup presents a specific fragility for the visitors. Oxford United are attempting to play an offside trap against a team that explicitly prioritizes “attempting through balls often.” This is a high-risk strategy for a defense that has conceded 33 goals and possesses a -9 goal difference. If Oxford’s line is even a fraction late, Ipswich’s attacking midfield trio—led by the creative presence of Núñez and the goalscoring threat of Philogene—will have clear runs at goal. Furthermore, Oxford are listed as “very weak” at defending set pieces. Against an Ipswich side that is strong in aerial duels and effective at shooting from direct free-kicks, this defensive weakness provides multiple avenues for the hosts to score, independent of open play.
Oxford’s away record further justifies fading them. They have won only 4 of their last 37 away matches across all competitions. While they may find the net—given Ipswich’s tendency to commit individual errors—their defense rarely holds firm on the road. The combination of Ipswich’s relentless attack and Oxford’s systemic defensive vulnerabilities points towards a home victory featuring at least three goals.
What could go wrong The psychological edge belongs to Oxford, who won the reverse fixture 2-1 in November. If Oxford’s offside trap is executed perfectly, they could frustrate Ipswich and turn the game into a stop-start affair, disrupting the hosts’ rhythm. Additionally, Ipswich are described as “very weak” at avoiding individual errors. Against an Oxford side that is strong at stealing the ball and transitioning quickly, a single sloppy pass in midfield could gift the visitors a lead, potentially changing the game state to a nervous, low-scoring chase.
Correct score lean
Ipswich Town 3-1 Ipswich’s attacking volume (averaging nearly 16 shots per game) and Oxford’s inability to defend set pieces suggests the hosts will score multiple times. A 3-0 scoreline is plausible, but Ipswich’s listed weakness in avoiding individual errors, combined with Oxford’s tendency to take long shots and attack down the right flank, suggests the visitors can grab a consolation goal. The 3-1 outcome reflects Ipswich’s dominance in possession and creation while acknowledging their occasional defensive lapses.
Selected Bookmakers Offers
| |
New cust. Deposit £10+ in 7 days & bet on sports. Min odds apply. Reward = 4 x £10 Free Bets (2 x £10 Bet Builders & 2 x £10 Sports bet). Valid 7 days. Free bets not valid on e-sports & non UK/IE horse racing. 18+. T&Cs apply. | |
| |
Open Account Offer - New Customers only. Bet £10 and get £30 in Free Bets when you join bet365. Sign up, deposit between £5 and £10 to your account and bet365 will give you three times that value in Free Bets when you place qualifying bets to the same value settle. Free Bets are paid as Bet Credits. Min odds/bet and payment method exclusions apply. Returns exclude Bet Credits stake. T&Cs , time limits & exclusions apply. Registration Required. #Ad. 18+ Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+. Play Safe. From 00:01 on 18.10.2022. £30 bonus. New customers only. Minimum £10 stake on odds of 1/2 (1.5) or greater on sportsbook (excluding Virtual markets). Further terms apply. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New customers only. Register, deposit with Debit Card, and place first bet £10+ at Evens (2.0)+ on Sports within 7 days to get 3 x £10 in Sports Free Bets & 2 x £10 in Acca Free Bets within 10 hours of settlement. 7-day expiry. Eligibility exclusions & T&Cs Apply. | |
| |
New cust only. Opt-in required. Deposit & place a bet within 7 days and settle a £10 minimum bet at odds of 4/5 (1.8) or greater to be credited with 3 x £10 Free Bets: 1 x £10 horse racing, 1 x £10 Free Bet Builder and 1 x £10 football. Free Bets cannot be used on e-sports and non-UK/IE horse racing. 7 day expiry. Stake not returned. 18+. T&Cs apply. Acca Club: Available to new & existing customers. 3 or more selections. Min Odds: 3/10 (1.3) per leg. Max stake: £500. Max Winnings: £200,000 per boost. Profit Boost amounts vary. Horse Racing, Greyhounds & Trotting excluded. Exclusions apply. Full T&C’s apply. 18+ GambleAware.org. | |
 | |
New members only. £10+ bet on sports (ex. Virtuals) 1.5 min odds, settled within 14 days. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days; £20 use on sportsbook, £10 on Bet Builder. Stake not returned. T&Cs.+ deposit exclusions apply #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New bettors. Select bonus at signup or use code SPORT. Wager deposit & bonus 8x. Max qualifying bet = bonus. Valid 60 days. Odds, bet & payment limits apply. T&Cs Apply; 18+ | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
New customers only, 18+. Min deposit £10. Place a £50 bet on any sport at 2.0+ to qualify for £25 in free bets and 10 Free Spins. Free Bets and Spins valid 7 days. £0.10 Free Spins. T&Cs apply. Please bet responsibly. #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
| |
New members only. £10 min deposit & bet on sportsbook (ex. virtuals), placed & settled at 1.5 min odds in 14 days of sign-up. Win part of E/W bets. Free Bets: accept in 7 days, valid 7 days, use on sportsbook only (ex. virtuals), stakes not returned. T&Cs Apply and deposit exclusions apply. Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
 | |
18+ New customers only. Opt in, and bet £10 on football markets (odds 2.00+). No cash out. Get 6x£5 football free bets at specified odds for set markets, which expire after 7 days. Offer valid from 12:00 UK Time on 25/08/2023. Card payments only. T&Cs Apply | gambleaware.org | Please gamble responsibly #Ad. 18+Only, gambleaware.org | |
